Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wolfe Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$295kReligion$226kHuman Services$80kEnvironment$18kHealth$14kRecreation & Sports$8kPhilanthropy$5kArts & Culture$300
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$422k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Kansas Endowment$20,000
Faith Lutheran Church$11,750
St Paul's Lutheran Church$10,250
St Joseph Center$5,000
Lutheran Family and Children's Serv$3,500
Missouri Botanical Garden$2,000
Forest Park Forever$1,000
Washington University in St Louis$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%St Joseph Center: $10k → 14%Lutheran Senior Services: $1k → 11%St Joseph Center: $5k → 14%St Joseph Center: $5k → 14%St Joseph Center: $5k → 14%St Joseph Center: $5k → 14%St Joseph Center: $5k → 14%St Joseph Center: $5k → 14%St Joseph Center: $4k → 14%St Joseph Center: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$611k · 10 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$611k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+44%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentReligionHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TK
    The Kansas University Endowment Association
    9× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +93%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +276%
  • MB
    MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -17%
  • WE
    Williams Educational Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lutheran Retirement Center Association

To address and meet the needs of aged persons, including housing, healthcare, and financial security.

—
2
Lutheran Hillside Village Foundation

Directs donations for use by lutheran hillside village, inc., allowing the entity to assist and care for the elderly in their time of need.

—
3
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
4
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
5
Lutheran Hillside Village Inc

To address and meet the needs of aged persons, including housing, healthcare, and financial security.

—
6
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Halls Ferry Manor Inc

To provide low income housing for the elderly

Housing & Shelter
9
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center

Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center (LGSHMC), founded in 1875 is one of the earliest hospitals in the Pacific Northwest. LGSHMC provides acute and tertiary care in Portland, OR with 539 licensed beds. LGSHMC provides a…

Health
10
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
11
Missouri Historical Society

The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…

Arts & Culture
12
St Louis University

The mission of saint louis university is the pursuit of truth for the greater glory of god and for the service of humanity. the university seeks excellence in the fulfillment of its corporate purposes of teaching, research, health care and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Senior Services; the most unlike its peers is Innsbrook Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Kansas University Endowment Association: $290,000 · EducationThe Kansas University Endowment Association+1 more: $250 · EducationFAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $141,600 · OtherFAITH LUTHERAN CHURCHSt Paul's Lutheran Church: $58,800 · OtherSt Paul's Lutheran ChurchLutheran Family and Children's Serv: $31,500 · OtherLutheran Family and Children's ServST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $22,250 · OtherST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH+4 more: $7,600 · OtherST JOSEPH CENTER: $47,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $18,000 · EnvironmentForest Park Forever Inc: $8,000 · EnvironmentLITTLE RED DOOR CANCER AGENCY INC: $13,500 · HealthUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyLUTHERAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 · ReligionCommunity Bible Study: $250 · ReligionInnsbrook Historical Society: $300 · Arts & Culture
Education$290,250Other$261,750Human Services$48,000Environment$26,000Health$13,500Philanthropy$5,000Religion$750Arts & Culture$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $290,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $47,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE RED DOOR CANCER AGENCY INC: $13,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Bible Study: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE RED DOOR CANCER AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Innsbrook Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Community Bible Study ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wolfe Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wolfe Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wolfe Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph