Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wohlers Family Foundation the Northern Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$260k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$2.3MHuman Services$960kAnimals$795kPhilanthropy$625kScience & Tech$295kArts & Culture$278kHousing & Shelter$200kEnvironment$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+1 grant · $260k
$70,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE$260,000
CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND$210,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC$200,000
MAYO FOUNDATION$200,000
THE SEEING EYE$150,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$150,000
ASPCA$100,000
SHEDD AQUARIUM$100,000
LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$75,000
MOTE MARINE LABORATORY$70,000
LSSI$56,874
PRENTICE WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$54,711
CHICAGO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$50,000
MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY$50,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $150k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
NJ
UT
CO
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 14 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$4.2M
$153k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEmploymentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAYO FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2024 · $825k
  • CL
    CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND
    4× · 2020–2024 · $820k
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $600k

Funded once

  • LC
    LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOR RESEARCH
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • BF
    BEST FRIENDS FOR SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • CC
    CHICAGO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
    one grant, 2020 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc

Dogs Inc mission is to transform lives by creating and nurturing extraordinary partnerships between people and dogs.

Human Services
4
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
5
The Anti-Cruelty Society

Anti-Cruelty is a private, nonprofit organization which was established in 1899 and is chartered in Illinois. Anti-Cruelty builds a healthy and happy community where pets and people thrive together.

Animals
6
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
7
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
8
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
9
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
10
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
11
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
12
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mote Marine Laboratory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO FOUNDATION: $825,000 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATIONCHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $820,000 · OtherCHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLINDFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION: $600,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATIONGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $450,000 · OtherGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLINDASPCA: $290,000 · OtherASPCALURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $210,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY: $175,000 · OtherPRENTICE WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $170,411 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $160,314 · Other+11 more: $764,874 · Other+11 moreTHE SEEING EYE INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $100,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $50,000 · AnimalsBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $30,000 · AnimalsAVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE: $260,000 · EmploymentCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $50,000 · Arts & CultureFACE AUTISM INC: $30,000 · HealthAdaptive Adventures: $15,000 · HealthCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $25,000 · Environment
Other$4,665,599Human Services$300,000Animals$280,000Employment$260,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Arts & Culture$50,000Health$45,000Environment$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE: $260,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFACE AUTISM INC: $30,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdaptive Adventures: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FACE AUTISM INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Adaptive Adventures ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wohlers Family Foundation the Northern Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wohlers Family Foundation the Northern Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wohlers Family Foundation the Northern Trust?

Find your warmest path to Wohlers Family Foundation the Northern Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wohlers Family Foundation the Northern’s filings →

More from the funding graph