Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wm O and Margaret H Dewitt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2022
15
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$70k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

85% of Wm O and Margaret H Dewitt Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Wm O and Margaret H Dewitt Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $124k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
11
’18
10
’19
8
’20
7
’21
8
’22
2
’23
3
’24
5
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.6MEducation$473kHealth$60kHuman Services$56kPublic Benefit$50kReligion$33kSocial Science$25kFood & Nutrition$19kOther$0
02FY2022 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k13 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$820k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YALE$70,000
YALE PARENTS ANNUAL FUND$25,000
MCLAUREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION$8,500
FRIENDS OF THE FORGOTTEN$3,000
ST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,500
CONNECTICUT COLLEGE$2,500
CHURCHILL SCHOOL AND CENTER$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
STRATFORD FESTIVAL$1,500
GROSSE POINT FARMS FOUNDATION$1,500
MARY INSTITUTE AND ST LOUIS COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL (MICDS)$1,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC INDIAN RIVER FOUNDATION$1,000
THE TAFT SCHOOL$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDS OF FORGOTTEN CHILDREN: $5k → 7%FRIENDS OF FORGOTTEN CHILDREN: $5k → 7%FRIENDS OF FORGOTTEN CHILDREN: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF FORGOTTEN CHILDREN: $3k → 7%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$490k · 28 repeat orgs$660k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2022, 19 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
8

Total granted

$490k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+50%

Still filing today

39%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue +82%
  • EH
    ENTITLEMENTS HOW INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +31%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FORGOTTEN CHILDREN
    4× · 2017–2020 · $16k · revenue +454%

Funded once

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +50%
  • BH
    BEAUMONT HEALTH (HOSPTIAL)
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • BH
    BEAUMONT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Taft School Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Edsel & Eleanor Ford House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,010,694 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $200,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION+2 more: $13,000 · PhilanthropySCHWAB CHARITABLE - ANDREW & AMY DEWITT: $200,000 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE - ANDREW & AMY DEWITTYALE: $145,000 · OtherYALEYALE UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSCHWAB CHARITABLE - ANDREW & AMY DEWITT FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE - ANDREW & AMY DEWITT FO…GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION - GOOD FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherGREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION - GOOD FOUND…ENTITLEMENTS HOW TO AKA ACROSS THE AISLE INC: $50,000 · OtherENTITLEMENTS HOW TO AKA ACROSS THE AISLE I…+31 more: $240,515 · Other+31 moreTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $50,250 · EducationENTITLEMENTS HOW INC: $50,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationNew York University: $25,000 · EducationMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $6,000 · EducationCHURCHILL SCHOOL AND CENTER: $6,000 · Education+3 more: $6,500 · EducationMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $14,500 · HealthBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthINDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 · HealthINDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · HealthVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureASPEN FILM: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF FORGOTTEN CHILDREN: $15,500 · Human ServicesMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesGROSSE POINTE FARMS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EnvironmentFriends of the Forgotten: $3,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$1,223,694Other$895,515Education$168,750Health$32,500Arts & Culture$17,000Human Services$16,500Environment$3,500Religion$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,010,694 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $50,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetENTITLEMENTS HOW INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF FORGOTTEN CHILDREN: $15,500 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $14,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDSEL & ELEANOR FORD HOUSE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCHILL SCHOOL AND CENTER: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN FILM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGROSSE POINTE FARMS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFriends of the Forgotten: $3,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetINDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ENTITLEMENTS HOW INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FORGOTTEN CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds EDSEL & ELEANOR FORD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHILL SCHOOL AND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN FILM ↗
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE FARMS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wm O and Margaret H Dewitt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wm O and Margaret H Dewitt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
  • The Learning Alliance Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wm O and Margaret H Dewitt Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Wm O and Margaret H Dewitt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wm O and Margaret H Dewitt’s filings →

More from the funding graph