Skip to content
Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc

The wisconsin chapter of the american academy of pediatrics (wiaap) strives to assure optimal health and well-being for all of wisconsin's children and their families and provide support and education to members, enabling them to continue to be the most effective providers of healthcare to children.

$252k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$766kCivil Rights$50k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$656k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CPESN WI COALITION INC$25,000
HEALTH CONNECTIONS INCORPORATED$25,000
SHAWANO-MENOMINEE COUNTIES HEALTH DEPARTMENT$25,000
LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC$25,000
AUTISM SOCIETY OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN$25,000
LANGLADE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$25,000
LAFAYETTE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$25,000
PROGRESSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC$15,000
O'CONNELL PHARMACY LTD$15,000
INPOWER SOLUTIONS$12,500
MULTICULTURAL COALITION INC$12,500
HO-CHUNK NATION DEPT OF HEALTH$12,419
WOOD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$10,036
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MULTICULTURAL COALITION INC: $13k → 9%PIERCE COUNTY: $25k → 9%GALESVILLE LTC PHARMACY: $25k → 9%LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $25k → 9%KENOSHA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $25k → 10%CASA ALBA MELANIE: $24k → 10%O'CONNELL PHARMACY LTD: $15k → 10%LAFAYETTE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $25k → 11%BAYFIELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $25k → 11%HMONG AMERICAN CENTER: $25k → 11%WOOD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $10k → 11%SHAWANO-MENOMINEE COUNTIES HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $25k → 11%EAU CLAIRE CITY- COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $25k → 12%ONEIDA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $25k → 12%LANGLADE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $25k → 12%HO-CHUNK NATION DEPT OF HEALTH: $37k → 13%MONROE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $23k → 14%CITY OF PRAISE INC: $25k → 17%THE CPESN WI COALITION INC: $25k → 8%MULTICULTURAL COALITION INC: $13k → 9%WISCONSIN PHARMACY FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%BAYFIELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $25k → 11%HMONG AMERICAN CENTER: $25k → 11%WOOD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $10k → 11%EAU CLAIRE CITY- COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $25k → 12%HO-CHUNK NATION DEPT OF HEALTH: $12k → 13%CITY OF PRAISE INC: $25k → 17%DANE COUNTY IMMUNIZATIONS COALITION: $10k → 10%PROGRESSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $15k → 17%DANE COUNTY IMMUNIZATIONS COALITION: $10k → 10%GERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER: $25k → 17%AUTISM SOCIETY OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN: $25k → 17%EQUAL PROTECTION COUNCIL: $25k → 17%EQUAL PROTECTION COUNCIL: $25k → 17%OUTREACH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $25k → 17%HEALTH CONNECTIONS INCORPORATED: $25k → 17%INPOWER SOLUTIONS: $13k → 17%INPOWER SOLUTIONS: $13k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$389k · 10 repeat orgs$428k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$389k
$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+18%

Still filing today

20%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthEducationCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EQUAL PROTECTION COUNCIL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k
  • HA
    Hmong American Center Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue -62%
  • CO
    CITY OF PRAISE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k

Funded once

  • PC
    PIERCE COUNTY
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • WP
    WISCONSIN PHARMACY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • GERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER Igraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Sioux Community Health Center Inc

The mission of promise community health center is to provide accessible, holistic health care that adapts to the needs of the community to improve the wellbeing of all persons.

Health
2
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
3
South Central Wisconsin Area Health Education Center Inc

Administer education and training programs for health professionals that are aimed at improving access to health care, with an emphasis on rural and under-served communities.

Education
4
Community Health and Wellness Partners of Logan County

Community health and wellness partners of logan county's mission is to serve as community partners in healthcare by providing economic-based, whole person, whole community primary care to anyone and everyone in our community.

Health
5
Northland Health Partners Community Health Center

Northland community health center is committed to providing access to affordable and quality health services.

Health
6
Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health
7
Community Health Systems Inc

Operate primary health care clinics, ultrasound, ob/gyn and five pharmacies.

—
8
Wisconsin Primary Health Care Association Inc

To improve health through the work of community health centers and their partners.

—
9
Hamilton Community Health Network Inc

To be the leader in providing comprehenshive quality, community-oriented health care for the underserved of genesee county.

Health
10
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
11
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
12
Glacier Community Health Center Inc

Glacier community health center's mission is to provide affordable, quality healthcare in a culturally sensitive and caring environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Progressive Community Health Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cpesn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EQUAL PROTECTION COUNCIL: $50,000 · OtherEQUAL PROTECTION COUNCILHmong American Center Inc: $50,000 · OtherHmong American Center IncCITY OF PRAISE INC: $50,000 · OtherCITY OF PRAISE INCBAYFIELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES: $50,000 · OtherBAYFIELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICESEAU CLAIRE CITY-COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $50,000 · OtherEAU CLAIRE CITY-COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTHO-CHUNK NATION: $49,839 · OtherHO-CHUNK NATIONPIERCE COUNTY: $25,400 · OtherANTIGOLANGALDE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $25,000 · OtherIMPOWER SOLUTIONS INC: $25,000 · OtherLAFAYETTE COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES: $25,000 · OtherCPESN: $25,000 · OtherGALESVILLE LTC PHARMACY: $25,000 · OtherCASA ALBA MELANIE HISPANIC COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $23,890 · OtherMONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH ORGANIZATION INC: $23,350 · OtherWOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES: $20,072 · OtherDANE COUNTY IMMUNIZATION COALITION INCORPORATED: $19,000 · Other+1 more: $15,000 · OtherHealth Connections Incorporated: $25,000 · HealthHealth Connections Incorpo…GERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER I: $25,000 · HealthGERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEA…OUTREACH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $25,000 · HealthOUTREACH COMMUNITY HEALTH …LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $25,000 · HealthLAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH…ONEIDA HEALTH SYSTEMS: $25,000 · HealthONEIDA HEALTH SYSTEMSAUTISM UNITED INC: $25,000 · HealthAUTISM UNITED INCKENOSHA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $24,932 · HealthKENOSHA COMMUNITY HEALTH C…Progressive Community Health Centers Inc: $15,000 · HealthProgressive Community Heal…WISCONSIN PHARMACY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationSHAWANO COUNTY ECONOMIC PROGRESS INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementMULTICULTURAL COALITION: $25,000 · Civil Rights
Other$551,551Health$189,932Education$25,000Community Improvement$25,000Civil Rights$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHmong American Center Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWISCONSIN PHARMACY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSHAWANO COUNTY ECONOMIC PROGRESS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMULTICULTURAL COALITION: $25,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetGERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER I: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOUTREACH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONEIDA HEALTH SYSTEMS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENOSHA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $24,932 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASA ALBA MELANIE HISPANIC COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $23,890 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetProgressive Community Health Centers Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Roots and Wings F…United Way of Greater…Greater Milwaukee Fou…Wisconsin Primary Hea…The Medical College o…Herbert H Kohl Charit…American Cancer Socie…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Roots and Wings Foundation IncWA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Primary Health Care Association Inc · The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home