· Public charity
Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc
The wisconsin chapter of the american academy of pediatrics (wiaap) strives to assure optimal health and well-being for all of wisconsin's children and their families and provide support and education to members, enabling them to continue to be the most effective providers of healthcare to children.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of WISCONSIN CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHAWANO-MENOMINEE COUNTIES HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $25,000 |
| AUTISM SOCIETY OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN | $25,000 |
| LANGLADE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $25,000 |
| LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC | $25,000 |
| LAFAYETTE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $25,000 |
| THE CPESN WI COALITION INC | $25,000 |
| HEALTH CONNECTIONS INCORPORATED | $25,000 |
| PROGRESSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC | $15,000 |
| O'CONNELL PHARMACY LTD | $15,000 |
| INPOWER SOLUTIONS | $12,500 |
| MULTICULTURAL COALITION INC | $12,500 |
| HO-CHUNK NATION DEPT OF HEALTH | $12,419 |
| WOOD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $10,036 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EPEQUAL PROTECTION COUNCIL2× · 2023–2024 · $50k
- HAHmong American Center Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue -62%
- COCITY OF PRAISE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $50k
Funded once
- PCPIERCE COUNTYone grant, 2024 · $25k
OUTREACH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%- OHONEIDA HEALTH SYSTEMSone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of promise community health center is to provide accessible, holistic health care that adapts to the needs of the community to improve the wellbeing of all persons.
Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.
Administer education and training programs for health professionals that are aimed at improving access to health care, with an emphasis on rural and under-served communities.
Community health and wellness partners of logan county's mission is to serve as community partners in healthcare by providing economic-based, whole person, whole community primary care to anyone and everyone in our community.
Northland community health center is committed to providing access to affordable and quality health services.
The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.
Operate primary health care clinics, ultrasound, ob/gyn and five pharmacies.
To improve health through the work of community health centers and their partners.
To be the leader in providing comprehenshive quality, community-oriented health care for the underserved of genesee county.
Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.
Glacier community health center's mission is to provide affordable, quality healthcare in a culturally sensitive and caring environment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Progressive Community Health Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cpesn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Hmong American Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SHAWANO COUNTY ECONOMIC PROGRESS INC ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Health Connections Incorporated ↗
- Who funds ONEIDA HEALTH SYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds AUTISM UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds GERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER I ↗
- Who funds ANTIGOLANGALDE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN PHARMACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CPESN ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL COALITION ↗
- Who funds KENOSHA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CASA ALBA MELANIE HISPANIC COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Progressive Community Health Centers Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Primary Health Care Association Inc · The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc?
Find your warmest path to Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.