· Private foundation
Winnowski Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
82% of Winnowski Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Bank Of America Charitable Gift Fd, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 17 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Winnowski Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $19k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PERICARDITIS ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,400 |
| CENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICES | $1,250 |
| SIENA COLLEGE ANNUAL FUND | $1,200 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $1,050 |
| TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION | $800 |
| HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $750 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $690 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ALBANY | $605 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $550 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| FATHER PETER G YOUNG FOUNDATION | $500 |
| VFW | $350 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2023, 39 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHELPING HANDS REENTRY OUTREACH CENTERS2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue +127%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND6× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +7%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc6× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- AMALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $3k
- PMPHOENIX MULTISPORT INCone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +10%
- PFPolish Festivalone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Polish Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
- Who funds PERICARDITIS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ABBEY FOUNDATION OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS REENTRY OUTREACH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICESINC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds SARATOGA SPRINGS UNIVERSAL PRESERVATION HALL ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX MULTISPORT INC ↗
- Who funds Polish Festival ↗
- Who funds OREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · The John and Kellyanne Murray Charitable Foundation · Wsb Family Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Keeler Motor Car Company Charitable Foundation · Review Foundation · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Winnowski Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Helping Hands Reentry Outreach Centers — 18% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- University of Portland — 1% of income from government
- Oregon State Sheriff's Association — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Symphony Association — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.