Skip to content

· Private foundation

Winkler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$47kEducation$36kHuman Services$19kFood & Nutrition$15kReligion$11kHealth$10kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$621k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dayspring Church$7,000
Oak City Cares$5,000
A Mother's Hope$5,000
Food Bank of NC$3,000
Boys & Girls Club$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
St Joseph Mission$2,000
The Women's Center$2,000
Choices Pregnancy Center$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PreBorn: $2k → 16%Interfaith Food Shuttle: $3k → 8%InterFaith Food Shuttle: $3k → 8%A Mother's Hope: $5k → 12%A Mother's Hope: $4k → 12%A Mother's Hope: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$107k · 10 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$107k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+6%

Still filing today

60%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    A MOTHER'S HOPE INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue +49%
  • OAK CITY CARES INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SA
    St Ann Food Pantry
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • CL
    COUNTY LINE CHURCH OF GOD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • TRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
2
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
3
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
4
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
5
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
6
The Center for Women and Families Inc

To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.

Human Services
7
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
8
Choices for Victims of Domestic Violence

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
9
Interchurch Organization Inc

The mission of the henry hosea house is to provide food and nourishment for the bodies and souls of the men, women, and children of the northern kentucky/cincinnati area. we are a cooperative ecumenical nonprofit agency made up of…

Religion
10
Inner City Mission of Springfield

The mission of inner city mission is to provide what is needed to help homeless children, their parents, and single women find their way home.

Religion
11
Saint Joseph's Mercy Care Services Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

—
12
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mission Pre-Born Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BISHOP DWENGER HIGH SCHOOL: $31,000 · OtherBISHOP DWENGER HIGH SCHOOLDayspring Church: $7,000 · OtherDayspring ChurchCharis House: $6,000 · OtherCharis HouseFood Bank of NC: $5,000 · OtherFood Bank of NCIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · Other+16 more: $28,500 · Other+16 moreST JOSEPH MISSIONS INC: $27,000 · PhilanthropyST JOSEPH MISSIONS I…A MOTHER'S HOPE INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesA MOTHER'S HO…INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $5,000 · Human ServicesINTER-FAITH F…Mission Pre-Born Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesMission Pre-B…OAK CITY CARES INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterOAK CITY C…VINCENT VILLAGE INC: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterVINCENT VI…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · HealthFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$81,500Philanthropy$27,000Human Services$17,500Housing & Shelter$14,000Health$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH MISSIONS INC: $27,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetA MOTHER'S HOPE INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetOAK CITY CARES INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVINCENT VILLAGE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JOSEPH MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds A MOTHER'S HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds OAK CITY CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE ↗
  • Who funds VINCENT VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne IncIN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Charlie Tippmann Foundation Charitable Trust · Mary Cross Tippmann Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Winkler Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Winkler Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Winkler Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph