Skip to content

· Public charity

Windermere Foundation

Every time a windermere sales associate sells a home, a portion of the commission goes to the WINDERMERE FOUNDATION, which was established in 1989.

$2.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
95
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$237k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$2.3MHuman Services$1.9MFood & Nutrition$1.6MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.4MCrime & Legal$1.2MYouth Development$989kEmployment$711kEducation$656kOther$0
02FY2024 · 95 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 95 grants below total $1,721,525, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,859,247 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,137,722 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k41 grants · $283k
  • $10k–50k48 grants · $778k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $661k
$10,300
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER$236,500
NORTHWEST HOPE & HEALING$99,588
TREEHOUSE$94,450
ANGEL FLIGHT WEST$88,450
NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH$82,379
HOMESIGHTSAM SMITH FUND$59,320
BELLEVUE LIFESPRING$47,500
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE$30,000
SEQUIM SUNRISE ROTARY FOUNDATION$28,326
LIFEWIRE$27,465
UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK$25,000
KIDVANTAGE$25,000
EDMONDS FOOD BANK$22,736
LEVEL THE FIELD SPORTS$22,000
BALLARD FOOD BANK$21,380
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $21k → 8%BELLEVUE LIFESPRING: $48k → 9%CASA DE AMPARO: $18k → 11%FAMILY RENEWAL SHELTER: $15k → 9%MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $19k → 9%MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER: $18k → 9%CANCER CARE NORTHWEST FOUNDATION: $35k → 12%CANCER CARE NORTHWEST FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $24k → 9%RYTHER: $16k → 9%LIBERTY ROAD FOUNDATION: $16k → 9%MARY'S PLACE: $123k → 9%MARY'S PLACE: $49k → 9%MARY'S PLACE: $47k → 9%MARY'S PLACE: $40k → 9%MARY'S PLACE: $38k → 9%MARY'S PLACE: $16k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $27k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $25k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $25k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $25k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $25k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $23k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $22k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $20k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $42k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $39k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $38k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $25k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $25k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $24k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $23k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $21k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $21k → 9%ISSAQUAH FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK: $48k → 9%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $33k → 9%KIDVANTAGE: $32k → 9%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $28k → 9%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $26k → 9%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $25k → 9%KIDVANTAGE: $25k → 9%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $23k → 9%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $20k → 9%YMCA CAMPING & OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP: $16k → 9%CAMPING AND OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP: $16k → 9%ISSAQUAH FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK: $15k → 9%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NW: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
MI
NY
OR
NV
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 151 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

151 repeat relationships: 70 still active in FY2024, 81 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

151
154

Total granted

$10M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+12%

Still filing today

88%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $246k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CJ
    CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +62% · 77% of their budget
  • NA
    NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $541k · revenue +108%
  • H
    HOMESIGHT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $384k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • PN
    PHILANTHROPY NORTHWEST
    one grant, 2020 · $171k · revenue -84%
  • SV
    SEATTLE VETERINARY OUTREACH
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +24%
  • FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
2
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
3
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—
4
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
5
Network Services

Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

Human Services
6
Family Promise of Pierce County

To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.

Housing & Shelter
7
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
8
Northwest Harvest Emm

The organization's mission is growing food justice through collective action. the organization's vision is ending hunger in washington state.

—
9
Solid Ground Washington

At Solid Ground, we work passionately to end poverty and build a more equitable community. Our services support people experiencing poverty by helping them achieve stability and expand their skills to realize their dreams. And that's just…

Housing & Shelter
10
Nourish Pierce County

To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.

—
11
Southwest Youth and Family Services

SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.

Human Services
12
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Womens Christian Association of Seattle-King County-Snohomish County; the most unlike its peers is Raymond T Moore Tacoma Rescue Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

303 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 303 of the 335 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
68
Early backer (in before they grew)
294/303
Grantees still filing
206/303
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC: $541,018 · OtherNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INCHOMESIGHT: $383,501 · OtherHOMESIGHTATTAIN HOUSING: $357,130 · OtherATTAIN HOUSINGBELLEVUE LIFESPRING: $305,909 · OtherBELLEVUE LIFESPRING+100 more: $3,836,400 · Other+100 moreMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $325,414 · Human ServicesMARY'S PLACE SEATTLETHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $216,514 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRIST…KIDVANTAGE: $209,950 · Human ServicesKIDVANTAGELifeWire: $192,715 · Human ServicesLifeWireYOUTHCARE: $138,100 · Human ServicesYOUTHCAREWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $88,750 · Human ServicesISSAQUAH FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK: $79,457 · Human ServicesCANCER CARE NORTHWEST FOUNDATION: $77,901 · Human Services+34 more: $897,404 · Human Services+34 moreCHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,178,750 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S J…SUNSHINE DIVISION INC: $44,758 · Crime & Legal+2 more: $35,000 · Crime & LegalSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $296,929 · HealthNORTHWEST HOPE & HEALING FOUNDATION: $152,288 · HealthANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $122,678 · HealthYouth Eastside Services: $81,500 · HealthAcres of Diamonds: $53,579 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $35,000 · HealthKOOTENAI HEALTH INC: $32,696 · Health+7 more: $114,901 · HealthCollege Success Foundation: $171,750 · EducationPark City Education Foundation: $87,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationEASTSIDE ACADEMY: $54,000 · EducationVANCOUVER SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $47,436 · EducationNORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS: $34,750 · EducationDenise Louie Education center: $33,000 · EducationCASA LATINA: $22,000 · Education+3 more: $43,729 · EducationSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $138,537 · PhilanthropyLAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $79,602 · PhilanthropyKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 · PhilanthropySEQUIM SUNRISE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $45,326 · PhilanthropyBAINBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $43,500 · PhilanthropyASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $40,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE SEAHAWKS WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $34,819 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,340 · PhilanthropyINVESTED: $19,500 · Philanthropy+4 more: $58,360 · PhilanthropyHOUSING HOPE: $154,147 · Housing & ShelterROSE HAVEN CIC: $84,000 · Housing & ShelterPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $67,004 · Housing & ShelterTACOMAPIERCE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterPEAR: $31,500 · Housing & ShelterNEW PHOEBE HOUSE: $28,199 · Housing & ShelterHumble Design Inc: $28,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $27,506 · Housing & ShelterGD ASSOCIATION: $17,350 · Housing & Shelter+3 more: $35,453 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,423,958Human Services$2,226,205Crime & Legal$1,258,508Health$889,571Education$569,165Philanthropy$554,984Housing & Shelter$508,159

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,178,750 over 8y, 77% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC: $541,018 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetHOMESIGHT: $383,501 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetATTAIN HOUSING: $357,130 over 7y, 7.6% of budgetMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $325,414 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $296,929 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $216,514 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKIDVANTAGE: $209,950 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLifeWire: $192,715 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCollege Success Foundation: $171,750 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPHILANTHROPY NORTHWEST: $171,020 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOUSING HOPE: $154,147 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST HOPE & HEALING FOUNDATION: $152,288 over 3y, 15% of budgetPROGRESSIVE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $147,513 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE EASTSIDE: $138,734 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $138,537 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $138,100 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBALLARD FOOD BANK: $136,914 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $128,725 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $122,678 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $112,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE VETERINARY OUTREACH: $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBRIDGE MEADOWS: $91,100 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $88,750 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPark City Education Foundation: $87,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC: $84,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetYouth Eastside Services: $81,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $79,602 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetISSAQUAH FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK: $79,457 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY: $78,898 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAMA'S HANDS DBA MAMMA'S HANDS: $78,125 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetCANCER CARE NORTHWEST FOUNDATION: $77,901 over 3y, 21% of budgetGeorge Pocock Rowing Foundation: $76,038 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEDMONDS FOOD BANK: $70,207 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $67,004 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC: $66,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFamily Promise of Spokane: $65,900 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE: $64,295 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $63,500 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Whatcom County: $63,215 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $60,580 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARMS AROUND BAINBRIDGE ASSOCIATION: $59,750 over 6y, 25% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $58,120 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTSIDE ACADEMY: $54,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAcres of Diamonds: $53,579 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMESIGHT ↗
  • Who funds ATTAIN HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
  • Who funds KIDVANTAGE ↗
  • Who funds LifeWire ↗
  • Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPY NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HOPE & HEALING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE EASTSIDE ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds BALLARD FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE VETERINARY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE MEADOWS ↗
  • Who funds PIKE PLACE MARKET QB2 ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Park City Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Eastside Services ↗
  • Who funds LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISSAQUAH FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MAMA'S HANDS DBA MAMMA'S HANDS ↗
  • Who funds CANCER CARE NORTHWEST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds George Pocock Rowing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDMONDS FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE123.1× affinity92 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Medina Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · School's Out Washington · Moccasin Lake Foundation · United Way of King County · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Windermere Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Windermere Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Bridge Meadows: 36% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres: 31% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Portland Housing Center: 19% of income from government
  • Human Solutions Inc Dba Our Just Future: 17% of income from government
  • Columbia Gorge Childrens Advocacy Center: 12% of income from government
  • Friends of the Children-Portland: 5% of income from government
  • Pear: 1% of income from government
  • William Temple House: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
93report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Windermere Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Windermere Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 335 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Windermere’s filings →

More from the funding graph