Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wilson Thompson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$100kReligion$46kHealth$15kArts & Culture$13kFood & Nutrition$5kHuman Services$4kHousing & Shelter$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$50,000
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$32,000
APOLOSTOLIC FAITH CHURCH$11,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$5,000
THE GOODMAN THEATER$5,000
BIBLE BAPTIST CHURCH$3,000
THIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES$3,000
ECUMENICAL SENIOR CENTER$2,500
MISERICORDIA HOME$1,000
CHICAGO CHAPTER CHARITIES FOUNDATION$1,000
ST PAULS CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ECUMENICAL SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 12%MISERICORDIA HOME: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
PA
CT
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 5 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$84k
$25k

Still filing today

0%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $37k
  • AF
    APOSTOLIC FAITH CHURCH
    5× · 2019–2024 · $22k
  • MA
    Mt Airy Church of God In Christ
    3× · 2020–2023 · $10k

Funded once

  • WS
    Wayne State University
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • WM
    WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -1%
  • NI
    NOURISHNYC I INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
2
Midwestern University Properties Corp

Title holding company for an exempt organization.

—
3
Mymichigan Health

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
4
University of Miami
—
5
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
6
Michigan Chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians

To support quality emergency care and to promote the interests and values of emergency physicians in the state of michigan.

—
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
9
University of Minnesota Alumni Association

The university of minnesota alumni association (umaa) fosters a lifelong spirit of belonging and pride by connecting alumni, students, and friends to the university of minnesota and each other. the alumni association advocates for the…

—
10
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
11
Ecumen

We empower individuals and families to confidently navigate aging so that it is a purposeful journey filled with dignity and support.

—
12
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Misericordia Home; the most unlike its peers is Nourishnyc I Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $37,000 · OtherWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYAPOSTOLIC FAITH CHURCH: $22,000 · OtherAPOSTOLIC FAITH CHURCHMt Airy Church of God In Christ: $10,000 · OtherMt Airy Church of God In ChristGoodman Theater: $10,000 · OtherGoodman TheaterWayne State University: $5,000 · OtherUniversity of Michigan: $5,000 · OtherNOURISHNYC I INC: $5,000 · OtherMisericordia: $5,000 · Other+7 more: $13,000 · Other+7 moreALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $50,000 · EducationALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERS…WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUND…MAYO CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthECUMENICAL SENIOR CENTER INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA HOME: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 · ReligionLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$112,000Education$55,000Health$10,000Human Services$3,500Religion$3,000Housing & Shelter$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECUMENICAL SENIOR CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHNYC I INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHAPTER CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wilson Thompson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wilson Thompson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wilson Thompson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph