Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wilson-Oconnor Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Philanthropy$2.4MInternational$2.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.0MHealth$950kEducation$892kHuman Services$750kArts & Culture$721kPublic Benefit$400k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.0M
$100,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$92M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$1,000,000
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$691,750
SAVE THE CHILDREN$600,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$250,000
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$250,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS CO CDS GLOBAL$250,000
PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT$200,000
NORWICH COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE$150,000
AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE MUSEUM$121,090
TOWN OF LEICESTER$100,000
MARY AND ELIZA FREEMAN CENTER FOR HISTORY AND COMMUNITY$100,000
CHICAGO SKY CARES$100,000
FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$100,000
MASCOMA VALLEY PRESERVATION$100,000
THE DYSLEXIA FOUNDATION INC$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHICAGO SKY CARES: $100k → 14%CHICAGO SKY CARES: $100k → 14%MARY AND ELIZA FREEMAN CENTER FOR HISTORY AND COMMUNITY: $100k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
CT
RI
MD
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 32% of Wilson-Oconnor Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Wilson-Oconnor Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 8 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$4.2M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalEducationPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $500k · revenue +9%
  • TD
    The Dyslexia Foundation Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $350k · revenue +47%
  • FS
    FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500k · revenue 0%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500k · revenue -75%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foreign Policy Association Inc

The mission of the foreign policy association today, as it has been for over 100 years, is to serve as a catalyst for developing awareness, understanding, and informed opinion on united states foreign policy and global issues. through its…

International
2
New England Historic Genealogical Society

New england historic genealogical society's mission is to advance the study of family history in america and beyond. we educate, inspire, and connect people through our scholarship, collections, and expertise. we conduct business under the…

3
Council of Independent Colleges

The council of independent colleges is an association of nonprofit independent colleges and universities, state- based councils of independent colleges, and other higher education affiliates, that works to support college and university…

4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
6
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
7
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

9
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
10
The Rhode Island Historical Society

The rhode island historical society, through its collections, museums, and educational initiatives, welcomes everyone to engage with rhode island's complex and significant past.

Arts & Culture
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund and the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
5/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $2,350,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABL…MASCOMA VALLEY PRESERVATION — $100,000 · Community ImprovementSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,600,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federat…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $500,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INCCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $500,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESAMERICAN RED CROSS CO CDS GLOBAL — $500,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS CO CD…INTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC — $100,000 · OtherLEICESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $100,000 · OtherThe Dyslexia Foundation Inc — $350,000 · OtherThe Dyslexia Foundation …PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $300,000 · OtherPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJEC…+2 more — $100,000 · OtherDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $691,750 · EducationDREXEL UNIV…FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · EducationFITCHBURG S…FRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $500,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS O…CHICAGO SKY CARES — $200,000 · Human ServicesCHICAGO S…MARY AND ELIZA FREEMAN CENTER FOR HISTORY AND COMMUNITY — $100,000 · Human ServicesMARY AND …BOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC — $500,000 · PhilanthropyNorwich Community Collaborative Inc — $150,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN INDEPENDENCE CENTER — $121,090 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE NEW DURHAM 1772 MEETINGHOUSE — $100,000 · Arts & CultureNEWPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $100,000 · Arts & Culture
Community Improvement$2,450,000International$2,100,000Other$1,950,000Education$891,750Human Services$800,000Philanthropy$500,000Arts & Culture$471,090

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $2,350,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,600,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $691,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC — $500,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $500,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $300,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO SKY CARES — $200,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetFITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetNorwich Community Collaborative Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NEW DURHAM 1772 MEETINGHOUSE — $100,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetMASCOMA VALLEY PRESERVATION — $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE — $50,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA6.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wilson-Oconnor Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Norwich Community Collaborative Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph