Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wilshire Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$33kRecreation & Sports$17kReligion$12kHuman Services$12kEducation$10kFood & Nutrition$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$124k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT WORTH STOCK SHOW EQUINE SCHOLA$10,500
KERR COUNTY FLOOD RELIEF FUND$5,000
TEXAS CHRISTION UNIVERSITY$5,000
FORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE$3,000
CANCER CARE SERVICES$2,500
TARRANT COUNTY FOOD BANK$1,500
BIRVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH$1,000
SAFE HAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY$1,000
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY$1,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$1,000
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF FORT WORTH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SAFE HAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $1k → 11%SAFE HAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $1k → 11%FREED PEOPLE: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$78k · 9 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$78k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+48%

Still filing today

22%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPublic BenefitEnvironmentEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FE
    FWSSR EQUINE SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $21k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $17k
  • FW
    FORT WORTH SPORTSMENS CLUB
    5× · 2020–2025 · $16k

Funded once

  • FP
    Freed Peoplegraduated
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +48%
  • FS
    FWSSR SCHOLARSHIP CLAY SHOOT
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • UG
    UNION GOSPEL MISSION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ducks Unlimited Inc Group Return

Ducks unlimited, inc. conserves, restores, and manages wetlands and associated habitats for north america's waterfowl. these habitats also benefit additional wildlife and people.

Environment
2
Thompson Cancer Survival Center

Thompson Cancer Survival Center provides support services for cancer patients, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to…

—
3
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
4
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
5
Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment
6
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
7
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
8
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
9
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
10
Young Texans Against Cancer Dallas

Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…

—
11
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
12
VolunteerNow

VolunteerNow transforms lives through volunteers. As the hub of volunteerism in North Texas, and a national thought leader, VolunteerNow provides a wide range of programs and services to build capacity for nonprofit and community…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ducks Unlimited Inc; the most unlike its peers is Texas Christian University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FWSSR EQUINE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $21,000 · OtherFWSSR EQUINE SCHOLARSHIP FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFORT WORTH SPORTSMENS CLUB: $15,900 · OtherFORT WORTH SPORTSMENS CLUBBIRDVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH: $11,000 · OtherBIRDVILLE BAPTIST CHURCHFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW EQUINE SCHOLA: $10,500 · OtherFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW EQUINE SCHOLATARRANT COUNTY FOOD BANK: $6,500 · OtherTARRANT COUNTY FOOD BANKTEXAS CHRISTION UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherKERR COUNTY FLOOD RELIEF FUND: $5,000 · Other+12 more: $13,915 · Other+12 moreFreed People: $6,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $2,000 · Human ServicesCANCER CARE SERVICES: $2,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $120 · HealthDucks Unlimited Inc: $2,300 · EnvironmentTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $1,000 · AnimalsDFW HONOR FLIGHT: $500 · Public Benefit
Other$105,315Human Services$8,000Health$2,620Environment$2,300Education$1,000Animals$1,000Public Benefit$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFreed People: $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDFW HONOR FLIGHT: $500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Freed People ↗
  • Who funds CANCER CARE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DFW HONOR FLIGHT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wilshire Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wilshire Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wilshire’s filings →

    More from the funding graph