Skip to content

· Private foundation

Willis M Hansen & Patricia a Hansen Charitable Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$229k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$105k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

89% of Willis M Hansen & Patricia a Hansen Charitable Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Willis M Hansen & Patricia a Hansen Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $229k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
6
’18
8
’19
9
’20
8
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$865kHealth$368kReligion$352kEducation$140kRecreation & Sports$75kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$7kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k10 grants · $21k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $208k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM$105,000
CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH$53,000
UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$8,500
NORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$4,000
NEW HAMPTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,000
TURKEY VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH NEW HARTFORD$1,000
LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA -BREMWOOD$1,000
LUTHERAN CHURCH MO$1,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,000
DREAM FACTORY$500
TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMPLIFY MISSION NETWORK: $3k → 11%MISSION CENTRAL: $1k → 8%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $865k → 10%UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%LUTHERAN SERVICES IOWA BREMWOOD: $7k → 7%CITY OF NEW HAMPTON: $75k → 8%MERCY MEDICAL CENTER: $250k → 9%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH NEW HARTFORD: $5k → 10%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA - BREMWOOD: $6k → 10%NORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%TURKEY VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 13%THE HOPE CENTER CO GRACE LUTHERAN CHAPEL: $500 → 11%MISSOURI GIRLS TOWN FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%LAKE REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $105k → 13%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1k → 21%DREAM FACTORY: $500 → 15%UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH NEW HAMPTON: $5k → 8%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH NEW HARTFORD: $5k → 10%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA -BREMWOOD: $1k → 10%NORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%TURKEY VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 13%LUTHERAN CHURCH MO: $1k → 11%LAKE AREA SART: $9k → 13%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1k → 21%NEW HAMPTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 8%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH NEW HARTFORD: $5k → 10%NORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%TURKEY VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 13%LAKE REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $3k → 13%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1k → 21%NEW HAMPTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 8%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH NEW HARTFORD: $1k → 10%NORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%TURKEY VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 13%LAKE AREA SART: $1k → 13%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1k → 21%NEW HAMPTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 8%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH NEW HARTFORD: $1k → 10%NORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%TURKEY VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 13%CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH: $98k → 13%NEW HAMPTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 8%CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH: $76k → 13%NEW HAMPTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 8%CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH: $65k → 13%CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH: $53k → 13%CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH: $29k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IA
PA
CA
MO
KY
AR
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 47% of Willis M Hansen & Patricia a Hansen Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Willis M Hansen & Patricia a Hansen Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$605k · 11 repeat orgs$367k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +59% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$605k
$366k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+59%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthReligionEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LR
    Lake Regional Health System
    2× · 2020–2021 · $108k · revenue +55%
  • NI
    Northeast Iowa Community College Foundation Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +65%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • MM
    MERCY MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +59%
  • CO
    CITY OF NEW HAMPTON
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
  • MG
    MISSOURI GIRLS TOWN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Medical Center - Centerville

We, mercy medical center - centerville and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communitites. mercy medical center - centerville is a member of trinity…

Health
2
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
3
Mercy Medical Center - Sioux City Foundation

We, mercy health services-iowa and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy medical center - sioux city foundation is a member of mercy…

Health
4
Mercy Health Partners

We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy health partners is a member of mercy health and trinity health.

—
5
Mercy Hospitalcedar Rapidsia Endowment Foundation Inc

Exclusively organized to foster, support, and encourage the mission and activites of mercy medical center.

Health
6
Mercy Harvard Hospital Inc

The mission of mercy harvard hospital, inc. (mhh) is "exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better." the foundation of this mission is based on a vision of quality: excellence in patient care; service:…

Health
7
Mercy Medical Center Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

—
8
Mercy Medical Center Foundation - North Iowa

We, mercy health services-iowa and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy medical center foundation - north iowa (the foundation) is a…

Health
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Mark Twain Medical Center

Mark twain medical center is committed to furthering the charitable and community-based health care purposes, mission, vision and core values. through teamwork and innovation, faith and compassion, advocacy and action, we endeavor every…

Health
11
Missouri Delta Medical Center Foundation

Fundraising for capital improvements, scholarships, and other healthcare programs for missouri delta medical center.

—
12
Mcmurry University

Shaped by christian principles, mcmurry university challenges students to examine our complex world from multiple perspectives in preparation for lives of leadership, service and professional success.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $864,528 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCCHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH: $319,332 · OtherCHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHUR…CITY OF NEW HAMPTON: $75,000 · OtherCITY OF NEW HAMPTONNortheast Iowa Community College Foundation Inc: $20,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH NEW HARTFORD: $17,000 · Other+9 more: $49,750 · Other+9 moreMERCY MEDICAL CENTER: $250,000 · HealthMERCY MEDICAL CENTERLake Regional Health System: $107,500 · HealthLake Regional Health S…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationMISSOURI GIRLS TOWN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,100 · ReligionAMPLIFY MISSION NETWORK: $2,500 · ReligionMISSION CENTRAL INC: $1,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$864,528Other$481,082Health$358,500Education$100,200Crime & Legal$25,000Religion$7,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY MEDICAL CENTER: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLake Regional Health System: $107,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI GIRLS TOWN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNortheast Iowa Community College Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMPLIFY MISSION NETWORK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE DREAM FACTORY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Lake Regional Health System ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI GIRLS TOWN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Northeast Iowa Community College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds AMPLIFY MISSION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MISSION CENTRAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DREAM FACTORY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Willis M Hansen & Patricia a Hansen Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willis M Hansen & Patricia a Hansen Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Willis M Hansen & Patricia a Hansen Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Willis M Hansen & Patricia a Hansen Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Willis M Hansen & Patricia a Hansen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph