Skip to content

· Private foundation

Williamson Rindge and Hole Family Foundation Fkarr and Tw Spectrum Fdn

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Education$42kHuman Services$30kAnimals$20kHealth$18kCrime & Legal$11kHousing & Shelter$10kRecreation & Sports$3kYouth Development$2k
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$441k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA SIERRA UNIVERSITY$15,000
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$10,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$4,000
TAKING IT TO THE STREET$4,000
MARY S ROBERTS PET ADOPTION$4,000
RIVERSIDE POLICE FOUNDATION$2,500
AMERICAN IRON SPORTS FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METROPLEX MILITARY CHARITABLE TRUST: $6k → 14%METROPLEX MILITARY CHARITABLE TRUST: $6k → 14%JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 8 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$125k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+14%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $18k · revenue +22%
  • RP
    Riverside Police Foundation
    4× · 2017–2021 · $11k · revenue +89%
  • TI
    TAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA
    4× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • GH
    GRATEFUL HEARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • JG
    JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Retired Fire and Police Benevolent Association
Crime & Legal
2
Loma Linda University Medical Center

Our mission is to continue the healing ministry of jesus christ, "to make man whole," in a setting of advancing medical science and to provide a stimulating clinical and research environment for the education of physicians, nurses, and…

Health
3
Loma Linda University Med Cntr-Murrieta

Our mission is to continue the teaching and healing ministry of jesus christ in a setting of advancing medical science and to provide a stimulating clinical and research environment for the education of physicians, nurses, and other health…

—
4
Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc

To participate in christ's ministry of health, healing, and wholeness for: education, healthcare, and research by providing support to the lluh entities.

—
5
Loma Linda University Children's Hospital Foundation

Our children's hospital foundation is dedicated to supporting loma linda university children's hospital's mission to bring whole-child healthcare to the region and beyond.

—
6
The Silvene Bracalente Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
7
For the Love of Street Dogs
Animals
8
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
9
Joseph J Laurencelle Memorial Foundation
Education
10
Sonoma County Deputy Sheriffs K-9 Association

To provide health care for retired k-9 deputies. educate the public in the roll k-9 deputies play in law enforcment

Crime & Legal
11
Lakeshore Foundation

To provide opportunity for individuals with disability to live a healthy lifestyle through physical activity, research, advocacy and health promotion.

Health
12
Los Gatos-Monte Sereno Police Foundation

To provide training of personnel and training equipment for the los gatos-monte sereno police department, a municipal corporation of the state of california.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loma Linda University Children's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Riverside Police Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARY S ROBERTS PET ADOPTION: $20,000 · OtherMARY S ROBERTS PET ADOPTIONLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $17,500 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+2 more: $2,600 · OtherLa Sierra University: $37,500 · EducationLa Sierra UniversitySTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOU…METROPLEX MILITARY CHARITABLE TRUST: $12,800 · Human ServicesMETROPLEX MILITARY …TAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA: $9,500 · Human ServicesTAKING IT TO THE ST…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesRiverside Police Foundation: $11,000 · Crime & LegalRiverside…American Iron Sports Foundation: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$55,600Education$41,500Human Services$22,800Crime & Legal$11,000Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLa Sierra University: $37,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPLEX MILITARY CHARITABLE TRUST: $12,800 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRiverside Police Foundation: $11,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetTAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA: $9,500 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJANET GOESKE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Williamson Rindge and Hole Family Foundation Fkarr and Tw Spectrum Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Williamson Rindge and Hole Family Foundation Fkarr and Tw Spectrum Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Williamson Rindge and Hole Family Foundation Fkarr and Tw Spectrum Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Williamson Rindge and Hole Family Foundation Fkarr and Tw Spectrum Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Williamson Rindge and Hole Family Foundation Fkarr and Tw Spectrum Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph