Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Williamson Rindge and Hole Family Foundation Fkarr and Tw Spectrum Fdn

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Education$42kHuman Services$30kAnimals$20kHealth$18kCrime & Legal$11kHousing & Shelter$10kRecreation & Sports$3kYouth Development$2k
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$441k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA SIERRA UNIVERSITY$15,000
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$10,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$4,000
TAKING IT TO THE STREET$4,000
MARY S ROBERTS PET ADOPTION$4,000
RIVERSIDE POLICE FOUNDATION$2,500
AMERICAN IRON SPORTS FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METROPLEX MILITARY CHARITABLE TRUST: $6k → 14%METROPLEX MILITARY CHARITABLE TRUST: $6k → 14%JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$125k · 8 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$125k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+14%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $18k · revenue +22%
  • RP
    Riverside Police Foundation
    4× · 2017–2021 · $11k · revenue +89%
  • TI
    TAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA
    4× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • GH
    GRATEFUL HEARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • JG
    JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Retired Fire and Police Benevolent Association
Crime & Legal
2
Loma Linda University Medical Center

Our mission is to continue the healing ministry of jesus christ, "to make man whole," in a setting of advancing medical science and to provide a stimulating clinical and research environment for the education of physicians, nurses, and…

Health
3
Loma Linda University Med Cntr-Murrieta

Our mission is to continue the teaching and healing ministry of jesus christ in a setting of advancing medical science and to provide a stimulating clinical and research environment for the education of physicians, nurses, and other health…

4
Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc

To participate in christ's ministry of health, healing, and wholeness for: education, healthcare, and research by providing support to the lluh entities.

5
Loma Linda University Children's Hospital Foundation

Our children's hospital foundation is dedicated to supporting loma linda university children's hospital's mission to bring whole-child healthcare to the region and beyond.

6
The Silvene Bracalente Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
7
For the Love of Street Dogs
Animals
8
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
9
Joseph J Laurencelle Memorial Foundation
Education
10
Sonoma County Deputy Sheriffs K-9 Association

To provide health care for retired k-9 deputies. educate the public in the roll k-9 deputies play in law enforcment

Crime & Legal
11
Lakeshore Foundation

To provide opportunity for individuals with disability to live a healthy lifestyle through physical activity, research, advocacy and health promotion.

Health
12
Los Gatos-Monte Sereno Police Foundation

To provide training of personnel and training equipment for the los gatos-monte sereno police department, a municipal corporation of the state of california.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loma Linda University Children's Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Riverside Police Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARY S ROBERTS PET ADOPTION — $20,000 · OtherMARY S ROBERTS PET ADOPTIONLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $17,500 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient — $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+2 more — $2,600 · OtherLa Sierra University — $37,500 · EducationLa Sierra UniversitySTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $4,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOU…METROPLEX MILITARY CHARITABLE TRUST — $12,800 · Human ServicesMETROPLEX MILITARY …TAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA — $9,500 · Human ServicesTAKING IT TO THE ST…+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesRiverside Police Foundation — $11,000 · Crime & LegalRiverside…American Iron Sports Foundation — $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$55,600Education$41,500Human Services$22,800Crime & Legal$11,000Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLa Sierra University — $37,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPLEX MILITARY CHARITABLE TRUST — $12,800 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRiverside Police Foundation — $11,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetTAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA — $9,500 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJANET GOESKE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Williamson Rindge and Hole Family Foundation Fkarr and Tw Spectrum Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Williamson Rindge and Hole Family Foundation Fkarr and Tw Spectrum Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Williamson Rindge and Hole Family Foundation Fkarr and Tw Spectrum Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph