Skip to content

· Private foundation

William L & Lesley H Collins Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$458k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$370k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.8MReligion$68kPhilanthropy$27kEmployment$25kHuman Services$24kInternational$19kFood & Nutrition$18kHealth$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $250k+1 grant · $370k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$370,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
STRIVE$5,000
DWIGHT ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL$5,000
TOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION (NY)$2,500
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$2,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NY - GALA$2,500
ST MATTHEW'S HOUSE OF NAPLES FL$2,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY COLLINS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,000
CITYMEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $100 → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $1k → 10%OF HOME FAMILY AND FUTURE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%GUADALUPE CENTER: $500 → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 28% of William L & Lesley H Collins Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

William L & Lesley H Collins Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 53 repeat orgs$492k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
40

Total granted

$2.9M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+8%

Still filing today

49%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $431k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK
    7× · 2017–2023 · $2.7M · revenue +12%
  • DS
    DWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $41k · revenue +33%
  • SI
    STRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $25k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +34%
  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S UNIV-M&K SIMONS SCHOLAR
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S UNIV-REVBTRACEY SCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
12
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Robin Hood Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Kowiachobee Animal Preserve Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $2,692,504 · EducationST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK+5 more: $54,500 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $370,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…HUMC FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+83 more: $164,100 · Other+83 moreROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $15,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropySTRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 · EmploymentOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,750 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,250 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,000 · InternationalHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $7,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $4,250 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $1,750 · Food & NutritionSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $1,100 · Food & NutritionGuadalupe Center Inc: $2,100 · Human ServicesOF HOME FAMILY AND FUTURE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $850 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $250 · Human Services
Education$2,747,004Other$584,100Philanthropy$25,500Employment$25,000International$16,000Food & Nutrition$14,100Human Services$4,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $2,692,504 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL: $41,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSTRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREAD TO LEAD INC: $12,500 over 5y, 67% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNIAGARA UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $4,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPARKYOUTH NYC INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetOF HOME FAMILY AND FUTURE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTEAM FIRST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKOWIACHOBEE ANIMAL PRESERVE INC: $700 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ITALIAN LANGUAGE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWNET: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds DWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds STRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds READ TO LEAD INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NIAGARA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds SPARKYOUTH NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Mutual of America Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · American Express Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William L & Lesley H Collins Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William L & Lesley H Collins Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Kowiachobee Animal Preserve Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William L & Lesley H Collins Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph