How much did WILLIAM J CAMMACK FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of WILLIAM J CAMMACK FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

foodcatholicmary'srangeleyresearchthomasarts

2022

vfdangel flightfoodrangeleycatholicmary'sair

2023

rangeleyjohnthomasartslakeschildren'ssaint

2025

greatjohnaircareartspregnancychildren's

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k40 grants · $130k
$10k–50k21 grants · $251k
$50k–250k1 grant · $129k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$12M

Total assets

Largest grants

AACA MUSEUM INC$128,653
FORK UNION MILITARY ACADEMY$20,500
saddleback mountain community corps$20,000
JOHN PAUL THE GREAT MONTESSORI ACAD$20,000
PROTEZ FOUNDATION$15,000
ST MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL$15,000
CHALICE OF MERCY$10,000
SETON SCHOOL$10,000
RANGELEY HEALTH WELLNESS CENTER$10,000
SAINT EDITH STEIN SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$10,000
BENEDICTINES OF MARY QUEEN OF APOST$10,000
RANGELEY FRIENDS OF THE ARTS$10,000
BETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FND FOR CHI$10,000
CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE$10,000
DIVINUM AUXILIUM ACADEMY$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 8%. 58% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.3M · 70 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

70 repeat relationships — 59 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.3M

$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%

+110%

Still filing today

46%

27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AM
AACA MUSEUM INC
5× · 2021–2025 · $509k · revenue +36%
DA
DIVINUM AUXILIUM ACADEMY
5× · 2021–2025 · $78k · revenue +1123%
PF
PROTEZ FOUNDATION
4× · 2022–2025 · $48k · revenue +394%

Funded once

WH
WILLIAM H SMITH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
one grant, 2021 · $50k
DN
DOMINICAN NUNS
one grant, 2020 · $10k
BO
BENEDICTINES OF MARY QUEEN OF APOSTLES
one grant, 2020 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Liberty Aviation Museum Inc

Arts & Culture

Mercy Flight Inc

Provide medical transportation primarily for the wny, western pa & southern ontario canada regions.

—

Catholic Medical Center

The heart of Catholic Medical Center is to carry out Christ's healing ministry by offering health, healing, and hope to every individual who seeks our care.

Health

Catholic Answers Inc

Apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world.

—

Aerospace Medical Association

Publication of a monthly journal for education of members of the medical and scientific communities related to the physiological factor in human space flight. Provide an annual meeting for members and qualified scientists for the…

Health

The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health

Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty

The mission of the Acton Institute is to promote a free and virtuous society characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious principles.

Civil Rights

Mercy Medical Center

Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

Health

Dignitas Ukraine Inc

The purposes for which the corporation is formed are charitable and educational,including, for such purposes, supporting the people of ukraine in defending their country, building a thriving society, and contributing positively to the…

International

Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc

Bon secours mercy health extends the healing ministry of jesus by improving the health and well-being of our communities and bring good help to those in need, especially people who are poor, dying and underserved. bon secours mercy health…

Health

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital

To advance the coordinated delivery of health services, guided with respect for the individual needs of our patients, thereby improving the health of our regional community.

Health

Liberty Womens Clinic

Liberty Women's Clinic ministers with the love of Christ by empowering people to make informed, life-affirming decisions about pregnancy, sexual health, and relationships.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/42

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,523

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

38/39

Grantees still filing

29/39

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,403,650Arts & Culture$538,110Education$191,500Health$106,500Human Services$84,250International$53,675Philanthropy$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

David S Cammack FoundationVA24.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: David S Cammack Foundation · Elkins Davis Fdn Charitable Trust · Catholic Community Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WILLIAM J CAMMACK FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: A COMMUNITY THAT SHARES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue held over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 521830975 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on A COMMUNITY THAT SHARES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to William J Cammack Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William J Cammack Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WILLIAM J CAMMACK FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to William J Cammack Foundation?

More from the funding graph

WILLIAM J CAMMACK FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to William J Cammack Foundation?

More from the funding graph