Skip to content

· Private foundation

William J Best Foundation

$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$400
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$4kHealth$4kEducation$2kPhilanthropy$2kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$465Animals$450Public Benefit$235Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$325
Median grant
1
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LASALLE HIGH SCHOOL$400
PRAY HOPE BELIEVE FOUNDATION$325
ST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATH$300
ST VINCENT DEPAUL NKY$245
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $25 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OH
NE
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12k · 22 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
16

Total granted

$12k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+67%

Still filing today

27%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts
    4× · 2019–2022 · $2k · revenue +2%
  • PH
    PRAY HOPE BELIEVE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $2k · revenue +50%
  • PF
    PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS
    3× · 2019–2021 · $195 · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN THE BAPTIST CHATHOLIC CHURC
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • SJ
    ST JOHN TGE BAPTIST CHATHOLIC CHURC
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • PH
    PRAY HOPE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $400
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
3
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
4
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
5
Humane Fort Wayne Inc

Humane fort wayne is a trusted partner providing comprehensive, lifesaving resources to pets and their people.

Animals
6
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
7
Columbus Cares for Cats
—
8
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
9
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
10
The Humane Society of Rochester & Monroe County for the Prevention of Cruelty to

Together with our community, we better the lives of animals through justice, prevention, and life-saving care. lollypop farm, the humane society of greater rochester, envisions a just and compassionate world for all animals.

Animals
11
Cherokee County Humane Society

Prevention of animal cruelty.

Animals
12
Spay-Neuter Assistance Program Inc

To prevent the suffering and death of companion animals and to enrich the human-animal bond by providing excellent, accessible, and affordable spay/neuter and veterinary care.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hamilton County Spca Inc Dba Spca Cincinnati; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

La Salle High School: $2,100 · OtherLa Salle High SchoolUNITED WAY: $1,598 · OtherUNITED WAYVinyard Community Church: $1,105 · OtherVinyard Community ChurchSt John Baptist Church: $1,000 · OtherSt John Baptist ChurchST VINCENT DEPAUL: $750 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAULST JOHN THE BAPTIST CHATHOLIC CHURC: $500 · OtherST JOHN TGE BAPTIST CHATHOLIC CHURC: $500 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL NKY: $445 · OtherPRAY HOPE FOUNDATION: $400 · OtherST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC CHURCH: $400 · Other+19 more: $2,485 · Other+19 moreCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $1,835 · Arts & CultureCincinnati In…PRAY HOPE BELIEVE FOUNDATION: $1,505 · PhilanthropyPRAY HOPE B…THE HAMILTON COUNTY SPCA INC DBA SPCA CINCINNATI: $190 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $70 · AnimalsANIMAL FRIENDS HUMANE SOCIETY: $35 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $25 · AnimalsPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $195 · Public BenefitMARCH OF DIMES INC: $50 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20 · HealthFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $25 · Human Services
Other$11,283Arts & Culture$1,835Philanthropy$1,505Animals$320Public Benefit$195Health$70Human Services$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $1,835 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRAY HOPE BELIEVE FOUNDATION: $1,505 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $195 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAMILTON COUNTY SPCA INC DBA SPCA CINCINNATI: $190 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $70 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL FRIENDS HUMANE SOCIETY: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
  • Who funds PRAY HOPE BELIEVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE HAMILTON COUNTY SPCA INC DBA SPCA CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL FRIENDS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William J Best Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William J Best Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William J Best’s filings →

    More from the funding graph