Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William G Janis & Susanne M Janis Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 91% of WILLIAM G JANIS & SUSANNE M JANIS FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 8 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +219% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
23

Total granted

$3.1M
$364k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+219%
+24%

Still filing today

25%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $2.0M
  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2021 · $800k
  • NF
    NMC FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $214k

Funded once

  • TS
    TRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -40%
  • EP
    EASLING POOL RENOVATION FUNDS
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • GT
    Grand Traverse Pavilions Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Top of Michigan Trails Council

We advocate and facilitate the development of a network of multipurpose recreational trails in Northern Lower Michigan.

Recreation & Sports
2
Michigan Trails & Greenways Alliance

Michigan trails & greenways alliance is the statewide voice for nonmotorized trail users, helping people build, connect and promote trails for a healthier and more prosperous michigan.

Arts & Culture
3
Traverse City Convention and Visitors Bureau Education Foundati

Educate the public about tourism in the grand traverse area

Recreation & Sports
4
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
5
Michigan Philharmonic

To enrich the communities of Southeastern Michigan in fostering excellence and innovation to our community in the performance of orchestral music to educate current and future audiences

6
Rotary Charities of Traverse City

Provides funding, learning, and connections to address our region's complex problems and create community assets for all.

Community Improvement
7
Broadway Grand Rapids

To present west michigan audiences with high quality broadway productions and to provide student arts education programs, enriching the community through professional performing arts, as well as to expand the diversity of theatre in the…

8
Traverse City Film Festival

The traverse city film festival is committed to showing just great movies and helping to save one of americas few indigenous art forms - the cinema. we are committed to showing great movies that both entertain and enlighten the audience.…

Arts & Culture
9
The Michigan Theatre of Jackson Inc

To renovate and restore the historic theatre and to provide a versatile center for the arts, entertainment, and education.

Arts & Culture
10
Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy

The mission of gtrlc is to protect significant natural, scenic and farm lands and advance land stewardship now and for future generations.

Environment
11
Impact 100 of Traverse City Inc

Impact 100 traverse city collectively funds transformational grants in the areas of environment/preservation, education, arts & culture, family, and health & wellness in the five county area of lower northwestern michigan including grand…

Philanthropy
12
Traverse City Dance Project

The Corporation shall have the purpose of supporting the creation and promotion of the arts, including visual and performance art, and providing education regarding the arts. The purposes include: to build and stage a bold mixture of new…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Old Town Playhouse Inc and the most unlike its peers is Palm Beach Childrens Chorus Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,999,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYNORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE — $800,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGENMC FOUNDATION — $213,670 · OtherNMC FOUNDATION+19 more — $183,869 · Other+19 moreTRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC — $250,000 · Arts & CultureOLD TOWN PLAYHOUSE INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureGrand Traverse Pavilions Foundation — $25,000 · PhilanthropyPALM BEACH CHILDRENS CHORUS INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyMICHAEL'S PLACE — $1,000 · HealthTRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION — $1,000 · HealthCHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 · AnimalsGRAND TRAVERSE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $400 · Recreation & SportsWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $100 · Human Services
Other$3,196,539Arts & Culture$260,000Philanthropy$35,000Health$2,000Animals$1,000Recreation & Sports$400Human Services$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC — $250,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetGrand Traverse Pavilions Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOLD TOWN PLAYHOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC
  • Who funds Grand Traverse Pavilions Foundation
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS
  • Who funds PALM BEACH CHILDRENS CHORUS INC
  • Who funds OLD TOWN PLAYHOUSE INC
  • Who funds TRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC
  • Who funds MICHAEL'S PLACE
  • Who funds CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION
  • Who funds TRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Traverse Regional Community FoundationMI30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · The Art and Mary Schmuckal Family Foundation · Oleson Foundation · Les & Ann Biederman Foundation Inc · The Julius H and Barbara B Beers Family Foundation · Siebenthaler Foundation · Hayden Foundation · Rotary Charities of Traverse City · Kegley Family Foundation · Green Brick Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William G Janis & Susanne M Janis Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William G Janis & Susanne M Janis Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William G Janis & Susanne M Janis Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph