Skip to content

· Private foundation

William F Welch & Lorene W Welch Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$168k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$437kArts & Culture$183kHealth$133kHuman Services$105kFood & Nutrition$36kReligion$27kCommunity Improvement$15kRecreation & Sports$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$103,000
SHERIDAN SENIOR CENTER$15,000
WYO THEATRE INC$11,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGE$10,000
THE FOOD GROUP$5,000
SHERIDAN CO LIBRARY FND$5,000
HOLY NAME CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,500
DOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION$3,000
KID'S LIFE$2,000
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$2,000
CHAPS$1,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,500
SHERIDAN PUBLIC ARTS$1,000
CASA$1,000
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $5k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $5k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 29 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -74% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
13

Total granted

$1.4M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-74%

Still filing today

31%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2022 · $95k · revenue +163%
  • DS
    DOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +25%
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • EN
    EXTREMITY NERVE RESEARCH FND
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • PA
    PEOPLE ASSISTANCE FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • AB
    ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shoshoni Senior Citizens Inc

The purpose of the entity is to provide activities, wellness and nutrition programs for senior citizens in shoshoni, wy and the surrounding area.

Human Services
2
Wyoming Wildlife Advocates

To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.

Animals
3
Black Mountain Nordic

Provide recreation and education for winter activities to include cross country skiiing and showshoeing in the greater sheridan area of wyoming utilizing forest service and other public lands.

Recreation & Sports
4
Wyldflower Learning Community Inc

To provide students a learning environment where they can develop independence, cultivate passions, and grow the skill sets needed to be successful and fulfilled in life

—
5
Cowboy State Daily

Cowboy state daily's mission is to provide high-quality local and statewide reporting on the issues that impact wyoming, featuring stories that capture wyoming's wonderful "small town with long streets" vibe.

Arts & Culture
6
Sheridan County Historical Society

Preserve and share our rich heritage, engaging present and future generations.

Arts & Culture
7
Sheridan Recreation District Suporg Inc

The organization's mission is to support the activities and programs of the sheridan recreation district

Recreation & Sports
8
Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals
9
Wyoming Sheep Foundation
Food & Nutrition
10
Sheridan County Historical Society Incorporated

The mission shall be to bring together those people interested in history and especially the history of sheridan county, ks. understanding the history of our community is basic to our democratic way of life, gives us a better understanding…

Arts & Culture
11
Sheridan Community Foundation

To support the sheridan community through charitable giving and to strengthen it with philanthropic education.

Philanthropy
12
Sheridan Stadium Foundation Inc

To plan, construct, and improve multi purpose athletic/activity facilities for the residents of sheridan county, wyoming. also, provide funds to support children focused non-profit organizations.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteers of America Northern Rockies; the most unlike its peers is The Food Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $479,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHERIDAN COLLEGE: $360,000 · OtherSHERIDAN COLLEGEBILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $95,000 · OtherBILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATIONSHERIDAN SENIOR CENTER: $69,000 · OtherSHERIDAN SENIOR CENTER+32 more: $265,600 · Other+32 moreWYO THEATRE INC: $158,000 · Arts & CultureWYO THEATRE…Northern Wyoming Community College Foundation: $27,500 · EducationDOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $15,000 · Human ServicesSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $12,000 · EnvironmentANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSHERIDAN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,268,600Arts & Culture$158,000Education$27,500Community Improvement$15,000Human Services$15,000Environment$12,000Recreation & Sports$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWYO THEATRE INC: $158,000 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetBILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNorthern Wyoming Community College Foundation: $27,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $12,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSHERIDAN KIDS LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FOOD GROUP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJOEY'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHERIDAN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WYO THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Northern Wyoming Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN KIDS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds JOEY'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation IncWY26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · The Roberts Family Foundation · Muriel and Seymour Thickman Family Foundation · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · Joe F and Roberta Napier Foundation · Bf & Rose H Perkins Foundation · Anne & Scott Nickerson Family Foundation · George Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William F Welch & Lorene W Welch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William F Welch & Lorene W Welch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William F Welch & Lorene W Welch Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William F Welch & Lorene W Welch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William F Welch & Lorene W Welch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph