Skip to content

· Private foundation

William F and Mary Louise Wischmeyer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$162k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$370kReligion$199kEducation$110kInternational$45kAnimals$43kHealth$27kYouth Development$11kFood & Nutrition$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $113k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST$29,500
LUTHERAN FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES$27,000
CHRIST THE LORD LUTHERAN CHURCH$20,500
SALVATION ARMY OF PHOENIX$15,500
MISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY$10,000
STEALING HEARTS RESCUE$10,000
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$7,500
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
US VETS$5,000
NAVAJO EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN MISSION INC$3,000
ARIZONA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TUITION ORGANIZATION INC$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
NATIONAL PARK TRUST$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN: $11k → 10%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN: $10k → 10%US VETS: $5k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN: $10k → 10%US VETS: $5k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN: $6k → 10%US VETS: $5k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN: $6k → 10%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN: $2k → 10%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $2k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $2k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $2k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $2k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $2k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $2k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $2k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $2k → 11%FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
CA
MO
MD
AZ
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of William F and Mary Louise Wischmeyer Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 40% of the giving stays in AZ; by stated purpose, 36%.

William F and Mary Louise Wischmeyer Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$813k · 28 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
2

Total granted

$813k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

79%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesReligionAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI
    9× · 2017–2025 · $167k · revenue +32%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST
    3× · 2023–2025 · $85k · revenue +22%
  • LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $44k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • R
    READWORKSINC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%
  • RN
    ROBERT N SOPER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge

Witnessing to god's love for all people, we stand with and advocate for migrants and refugees, transforming communities through ministries of service and justice.

—
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Lutheran Social Service of Minnesota

Lutheran social service of minnesota expresses the love of christ for all people through service that inspires hope, changes lives and builds community. lutheran social service of minnesota and affiliates is one of minnesota's largest and…

Human Services
9
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
10
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
11
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest; the most unlike its peers is Stealing Hearts Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI: $167,000 · OtherLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURICHRIST THE LORD LUTHERAN CHURCH: $102,700 · OtherCHRIST THE LORD LUTHERAN CHURCHCHRIST THE LORD LUTHERAN CHURCH: $69,600 · OtherCHRIST THE LORD LUTHERAN CHURCHSALVATION ARMY OF PHOENIX: $46,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF PHOENIXIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · Other+6 more: $26,000 · Other+6 moreLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST: $85,000 · ReligionLUTHERAN SOCIAL…Navajo Evangelical Lutheran Mission Inc: $27,000 · ReligionNavajo Evangeli…MISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY: $37,000 · EducationMISSOURI MILIT…ARIZONA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TUITION: $24,000 · EducationARIZONA CHRIST…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $21,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER…READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $18,000 · EducationREADING IS FUN…READWORKSINC: $4,000 · EducationLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $43,500 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN S…Foothills Caring Corps Inc: $18,000 · Human ServicesFoothills …UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $15,000 · Human ServicesUNITED STA…LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $22,500 · InternationalOUTREACH INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $6,000 · InternationalEVIDENCE ACTION: $4,000 · InternationalSTEALING HEARTS RESCUE INC: $25,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $18,000 · AnimalsActive Minds Inc: $6,000 · HealthCancer Care Inc: $4,000 · Health
Other$428,800Religion$112,000Education$104,000Human Services$76,500International$44,500Animals$43,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI: $167,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST: $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $43,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY: $37,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNavajo Evangelical Lutheran Mission Inc: $27,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSTEALING HEARTS RESCUE INC: $25,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetARIZONA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TUITION: $24,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFoothills Caring Corps Inc: $18,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOUTREACH INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK TRUST INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVIDENCE ACTION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADWORKSINC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Navajo Evangelical Lutheran Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEALING HEARTS RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TUITION ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Caring Corps Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Active Minds Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds EVIDENCE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds READWORKSINC ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Financial for LutheransMN14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · American Express Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William F and Mary Louise Wischmeyer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William F and Mary Louise Wischmeyer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • National Park Trust Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William F and Mary Louise Wischmeyer Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William F and Mary Louise Wischmeyer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William F and Mary Louise Wischmeyer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph