· Private foundation
William Dean Fausett Fndtn for the Presv & Protection of Green Mt Boy History Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 82% of WILLIAM DEAN FAUSETT FNDTN FOR THE PRESV & PROTECTION OF GREEN MT BOY HISTORY INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MANCHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD | $3,000 |
| SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL CENTER | $2,500 |
| VNA & HOSPICE OF THE SOUTHWEST REGION | $2,500 |
| NORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| INTERFAITH SUPPORT SERVICES | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| BENNINGTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| FRANCIS OF ASSISI SOCIETY FOR ANIMALS | $1,500 |
| SASH | $1,500 |
| FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH | $1,500 |
| UNITED CHURCH OF DORSET | $1,500 |
| RUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $1,500 |
| CHRIST OUR SAVIOR CHURCH | $1,500 |
| MANCHESTER COMMUNITY LIBRARY | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
43 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NDNORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +211%
- SHShires Housing Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +40%
- RCRUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +92%
Funded once
- RRAVNAHone grant, 2018 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $3k
- MHManchester Health Services Incone grant, 2017 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.
Animal shelter and rescue
Rescue animals
Animal rescue organization
Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc rescues dogs and cats from southern state kill shelters and off the streets to save them being euthanized. We also help contract by the pet population by spaying and neutering and educating the public on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rutland County Humane Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Runaways Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Born Free Pet Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Shires Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds RUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC DBA NORTHSHIRE RESCUE SQUAD ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETYOF MORGAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds VNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc ↗
- Who funds PAW WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds Runaways Animal Rescue ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Truettner Family Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization William Dean Fausett Fndtn for the Presv & Protection of Green Mt Boy History Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shires Housing Inc — 100% of income from government
- Northshire Day School — 39% of income from government
- Bennington Project Independence Inc — 32% of income from government
- Vna & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc — 5% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to William Dean Fausett Fndtn for the Presv & Protection of Green Mt Boy History Inc?
Find your warmest path to William Dean Fausett Fndtn for the Presv & Protection of Green Mt Boy History Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.