Skip to content

· Private foundation

William Dean Fausett Fndtn for the Presv & Protection of Green Mt Boy History Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$107kEducation$85kReligion$79kHealth$58kHousing & Shelter$37kFood & Nutrition$34kArts & Culture$16kHuman Services$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANCHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD$3,000
VNA & HOSPICE OF THE SOUTHWEST REGION$2,500
SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL CENTER$2,500
BENNINGTON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
INTERFAITH SUPPORT SERVICES$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
NORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
MANCHESTER COMMUNITY LIBRARY$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MS CENTER$1,500
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$1,500
UNITED CHURCH OF DORSET$1,500
RUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$1,500
FRANCIS OF ASSISI SOCIETY FOR ANIMALS$1,500
ARISE MIAMI SDA CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 15%BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $2k → 11%BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $2k → 11%BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $2k → 11%BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $2k → 11%BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $2k → 11%BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $2k → 11%BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 11%BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 11%BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $900 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$496k · 43 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
4

Total granted

$496k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+96%

Still filing today

30%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +211%
  • SH
    Shires Housing Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +40%
  • RC
    RUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • R
    RAVNAH
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • MH
    Manchester Health Services Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beaverhead Animal Shelter

The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.

Animals
2
New England Animal Health Inc
Science & Tech
3
Wayne County Humane Society
Animals
4
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
5
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
6
Hart

Animal shelter and rescue

Animals
7
Muttsnstuff

Rescue animals

Animals
8
Winchester Historical Society
—
9
Unos Home for Wayward Cats and Dogs

Animal rescue organization

Animals
10
North Bay Animal Services
Animals
11
Bristow Barnyard Farm and Domestic Animal Rescue
Animals
12
Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc

Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc rescues dogs and cats from southern state kill shelters and off the streets to save them being euthanized. We also help contract by the pet population by spaying and neutering and educating the public on…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rutland County Humane Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Runaways Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL CENTER: $42,800 · OtherSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL CENTERMANCHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD: $33,700 · OtherMANCHESTER FOOD CUPBOARDBorn Free Pet Shelter Inc: $25,000 · OtherBorn Free Pet Shelter IncNORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL: $22,600 · OtherMANCHESTER COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $21,600 · OtherShires Housing Inc: $20,600 · OtherVNA HOSPICE SOUTHWEST REGION: $18,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MS CENTER: $18,000 · OtherSASH: $17,100 · OtherARISE MIAMI SDA CHURCH: $16,100 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherUNITED CHURCH OF DORSET: $15,500 · OtherINTERFAITH SUPPORT SERVICES: $14,600 · Other+27 more: $148,700 · Other+27 moreRUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $17,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETYOF MORGAN COUNTY: $8,300 · AnimalsPAW WARRIORS INC: $5,300 · AnimalsRunaways Animal Rescue: $4,300 · AnimalsSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION: $15,600 · HealthMANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC DBA NORTHSHIRE RESCUE SQUAD: $8,600 · HealthBENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE INC: $11,900 · Human ServicesCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $13,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $2,500 · EducationNEXT STAGE ARTS PROJECT INC: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$429,800Animals$34,900Health$24,200Human Services$19,900Education$15,500Arts & Culture$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBorn Free Pet Shelter Inc: $25,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetNORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL: $22,600 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetShires Housing Inc: $20,600 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetRUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $17,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION: $15,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE INC: $11,900 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC DBA NORTHSHIRE RESCUE SQUAD: $8,600 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETYOF MORGAN COUNTY: $8,300 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc: $7,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAW WARRIORS INC: $5,300 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetRunaways Animal Rescue: $4,300 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetManchester Health Services Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT STAGE ARTS PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMANCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Born Free Pet Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Shires Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds RUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds BENNINGTON PROJECT INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER RESCUE SQUAD INC DBA NORTHSHIRE RESCUE SQUAD ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETYOF MORGAN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds VNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAW WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds Runaways Animal Rescue ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Truettner Family Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William Dean Fausett Fndtn for the Presv & Protection of Green Mt Boy History Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William Dean Fausett Fndtn for the Presv & Protection of Green Mt Boy History Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Shires Housing Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Northshire Day School: 39% of income from government
  • Bennington Project Independence Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Vna & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc: 5% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William Dean Fausett Fndtn for the Presv & Protection of Green Mt Boy History Inc?

Find your warmest path to William Dean Fausett Fndtn for the Presv & Protection of Green Mt Boy History Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William Dean Fausett Fndtn for the Presv & Protection of Green Mt Boy History’s filings →

More from the funding graph