Skip to content

· Private foundation

William C & Antoinette M Childs Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$25kReligion$9kEducation$7kHuman Services$2kArts & Culture$850Environment$500Philanthropy$500Public Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150
Median grant
5
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$150
RAPHAEL COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC$100
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$100
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$100
NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL$50
MONASTERY OF THE INFANT JESUS$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $420) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOYS TOWN: $20 → 12%HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $100 → 13%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $50 → 20%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $50 → 20%BOYS' HAVEN OF AMERICA INC: $200 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
SD
NE
WV
VA
KS
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 23 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
25

Total granted

$52k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+32%

Still filing today

39%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2024 · $12k · revenue +82%
  • JR
    Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +63%
  • PH
    PETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • LU
    Lamar University Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -29%
  • P2
    PLAYHOUSE 2000 INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $550 · revenue +32%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue ×103
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
2
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
3
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Hillcrest Family Health Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
9
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Methodist Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Raphael Community Free Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $7,500 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERNOTRE DAME CATHOLIC CHURCH: $6,500 · OtherNOTRE DAME CATHOLIC CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMD ANDERSON: $2,700 · OtherMD ANDERSONIndividual grant recipient: $1,750 · OtherSAN ANTONIO ACADEMY: $1,300 · Other+24 more: $6,641 · Other+24 moreTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $11,500 · HealthTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATIO…Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $3,000 · HealthJulie Rogers Gift of Life Progra…PETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,400 · HealthPETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION+3 more: $750 · HealthLamar University Foundation Inc: $1,500 · EducationKEYSTONE SCHOOL: $250 · EducationWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $200 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $100 · Education+1 more: $25 · EducationBoys Haven of America Inc: $200 · Human ServicesHILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $100 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $100 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $20 · Human ServicesNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $500 · PhilanthropyKerr County Sheriff's Foundation: $500 · Crime & LegalBANDERA FIRE & RESCUE: $250 · Public Safety & DisasterNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $250 · Public Safety & DisasterJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $430 · Public Benefit
Other$37,391Health$16,650Education$2,075Human Services$520Philanthropy$500Crime & Legal$500Public Safety & Disaster$500Public Benefit$430

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLamar University Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKerr County Sheriff's Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $430 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRAPHAEL COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROTHERS OF THE SACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBANDERA FIRE & RESCUE: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKEYSTONE SCHOOL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBoys Haven of America Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
  • Who funds Lamar University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLAYHOUSE 2000 INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Kerr County Sheriff's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPHAEL COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BROTHERS OF THE SACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BANDERA FIRE & RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys Haven of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH ↗
  • Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Floyd a & Kathleen C Cailloux FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Floyd a & Kathleen C Cailloux Foundation · Hal & Charlie Peterson Foundation & Fd Mgmt Trust · The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William C & Antoinette M Childs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William C & Antoinette M Childs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William C & Antoinette M Childs’ filings →

More from the funding graph