Skip to content

· Private foundation

William and Karen England Charitable Trust (WAKE Foundation)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$49kHealth$10kPublic Benefit$7kInternational$7kArts & Culture$7kYouth Development$6kEducation$4kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$314k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Grace Community Church$17,602
Samaritan's Purse$2,500
Young Life of Howard County$2,186
World Telehealth Initiative$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,400
Scouting America Hoosier Trails Council$1,000
Tim Tebow Foundation$1,000
The Navigators$1,000
CTEL (Ctr for Telehealth & E-Health Law)$1,000
Special Olympics Howard County$600
Engineering Ministries Intl$500
Christian Legal Society$500
CRU$500
Schools Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition$500
University of Maryland School of Law$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $850) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Camp Inclusion: $50 → 6%Family Research Council: $500 → 14%Family Research Council: $300 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$102k · 23 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
7

Total granted

$102k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-4%

Still filing today

48%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesReligionAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +40%
  • WT
    WORLD TELEHEALTH INITIATIVE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +2%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR TELEHEALTH & E-HEALTH LAW
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • RM
    Reservoir Music Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $300
  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $250 · revenue -17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
2
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
3
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
4
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
5
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
8
Mission Mutual

Equipping mission, ministry, and philanthropic organizations (of similar vision) with the organizational and relational perspective needed to accelerate and enhance their collective impact. mission mutual exists to provide centralized…

International
9
Christians for Biblical Equality

See schedule o.christians for biblical equality (cbe), www.cbeinternational.org, is a 501c3 nonprofit organization comprised of individuals, churches, colleges, seminaries, and organizations, representing more than 100 different…

—
10
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
Train the Nations
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Engineering Ministries International Usa; the most unlike its peers is Stronghold Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Grace Community Church: $43,846 · OtherGrace Community ChurchCombined Federal Campaign: $6,850 · OtherCombined Federal CampaignTHE NAVIGATORS: $4,800 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSYoung Life of Howard County: $4,686 · OtherYoung Life of Howard County+21 more: $22,318 · Other+21 moreWORLD TELEHEALTH INITIATIVE: $4,565 · HealthWORLD TEL…CENTER FOR TELEHEALTH & E-HEALTH LAW: $4,000 · HealthCENTER FO…+1 more: $250 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · Religion+1 more: $150 · ReligionSCHOOLS HEALTH AND LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION: $2,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $1,600 · EducationCANINE HUMANE NETWORK: $3,400 · AnimalsHUGH O'BRIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP: $1,100 · Youth DevelopmentENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA: $1,100 · Science & Tech
Other$82,500Health$8,815Religion$5,150Education$4,100Animals$3,400Youth Development$1,100Science & Tech$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD TELEHEALTH INITIATIVE: $4,565 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR TELEHEALTH & E-HEALTH LAW: $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCANINE HUMANE NETWORK: $3,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOLS HEALTH AND LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPURDUE CHRISTIAN CAMPUS HOUSE INC: $1,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $1,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUGH O'BRIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP: $1,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP INCLUSION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTRONGHOLD INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD TELEHEALTH INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TELEHEALTH & E-HEALTH LAW ↗
  • Who funds CANINE HUMANE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOLS HEALTH AND LIBRARIES BROADBAND COALITION ↗
  • Who funds PURDUE CHRISTIAN CAMPUS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds HUGH O'BRIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP INCLUSION INC ↗
  • Who funds STRONGHOLD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William and Karen England Charitable Trust (WAKE Foundation) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William and Karen England Charitable Trust (WAKE Foundation). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William and Karen England Charitable Trust (WAKE Foundation)?

Find your warmest path to William and Karen England Charitable Trust (WAKE Foundation) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William and Karen England Charitable Trust (WAKE Foundation)’s filings →

More from the funding graph