Skip to content

· Private foundation

William a Solomene Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.8MReligion$1.6MHealth$1.1MYouth Development$905kSocial Science$307kAnimals$298kHousing & Shelter$190kHuman Services$175kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $938k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
$40,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS$1,075,000
ST PHILLIPS CATHOLIC CHURCH$425,000
UTSW MEDICAL CENTER$340,000
FREE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$248,000
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$200,000
ACADEMY OF PHILOSOPHY$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$70,000
ANIMAL REFUGE FOUNDATION$60,000
CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK$60,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
NEW OXFORD REVIEW$40,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $33k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $18k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $18k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $15k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $13k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $10k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $10k → 5%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MA
CA
UT
MD
DE
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 27 repeat orgs$796k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
26

Total granted

$6.2M
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+27%

Still filing today

48%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $540k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Dallas
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +5%
  • AR
    ANIMAL REFUGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $207k · revenue +3%
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $190k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PHILIP THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHU
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • LX
    LEO XIII CENTER FOR PHILOSOPHY &
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • SC
    SPSA CATHOLIC ACADEMY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
6
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
7
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
8
The Institute for the Psychological Sciences Inc

Divine Mercy University is a Catholic graduate school of psychology and counseling, founded in 1999. The University is dedicated to the scientific study of psychology and counseling with a Catholic understanding of the person, marriage and…

Education
9
Allbritton Journalism Institute

Allbritton journalism institute aims to train a new generation of non-partisan political reporters from diverse backgrounds to produce high-quality, fact-based journalism.

Education
10
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
11
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
12
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Patriot Paws Service Dogs; the most unlike its peers is Free Enterprise Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PHILLIPS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $1,150,000 · OtherST PHILLIPS CATHOLIC CHURCHUTSW MEDICAL CENTER: $839,000 · OtherUTSW MEDICAL CENTERACADEMY OF PHILOSOPHY: $307,000 · OtherACADEMY OF PHILOSOPHYWEST SIDE HELPING HAND: $277,129 · OtherWEST SIDE HELPING HANDST PHILIP THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC: $180,000 · OtherBONTON FARMS COMMUNITIES FDN: $140,000 · Other+45 more: $1,178,371 · Other+45 moreUniversity of Dallas: $1,275,000 · EducationUniversity of DallasSouthern Methodist University: $200,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist Univers…The Charlemagne Institute: $123,000 · EducationThe Charlemagne Institute+2 more: $12,500 · EducationFree Enterprise Institute: $628,000 · Youth DevelopmentFree Enter…ANIMAL REFUGE FOUNDATION: $207,000 · AnimalsOPERATION KINDNESS: $20,000 · Animals+1 more: $6,000 · AnimalsHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $190,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE: $138,500 · Arts & CulturePATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $125,000 · Human Services
Other$4,071,500Education$1,610,500Youth Development$628,000Animals$233,000Housing & Shelter$190,000Arts & Culture$138,500Human Services$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Dallas: $1,275,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetFree Enterprise Institute: $628,000 over 6y, 80% of budgetWEST SIDE HELPING HAND: $277,129 over 5y, 20% of budgetANIMAL REFUGE FOUNDATION: $207,000 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $190,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE: $138,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $125,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetThe Charlemagne Institute: $123,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetNew Oxford Review Inc: $65,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGAPE CLINIC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA VOICE FOR ALL PAWS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA PROMESA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds Free Enterprise Institute ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE HELPING HAND ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL REFUGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE ↗
  • Who funds PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS ↗
  • Who funds The Charlemagne Institute ↗
  • Who funds New Oxford Review Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William a Solomene Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William a Solomene Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William a Solomene Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William a Solomene Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William a Solomene’s filings →

    More from the funding graph