Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William a Robinson Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Arts & Culture$216kAnimals$104kPhilanthropy$13kHuman Services$8kCommunity Improvement$8kEducation$5kHealth$5kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $130k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROBINSON FILM CENTER$130,250
ROBINSON RESCUE$32,084
BFF OF DESOTO ANIMAL SERVICE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
LOUISIANA FILM PRIZE FOUNDATION$10,500
SHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL$5,000
INDEPENDENCE BOWL FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GBSCIDP FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 7%NODCC: $10k → 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 17%US LUSITANO ASSOCIATION: $5k → 5%BFF OF DESOTO ANIMAL SERVICE: $15k → 20%CHIMP HAVEN: $6k → 22%NODCC: $3k → 10%BFF OF DESOTO ANIMAL SERVICE: $5k → 20%CHIMP HAVEN: $3k → 22%BFF OF DESOTO ANIMAL SERVICE: $5k → 20%CHIMP HAVEN: $3k → 22%BFF OF DESOTO ANIMAL SERVICE: $1k → 20%ROBINSON FILM CENTER: $130k → 22%ROBINSON FILM CENTER: $30k → 22%ROBINSON FILM CENTER: $15k → 22%LOUISIANA FILM PRIZE FOUNDATION: $11k → 22%LOUISIANA FILM PRIZE FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%INDEPENDENCE BOWL FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%LOUISIANA FILM PRIZE: $5k → 22%ROBINSON RESCUE: $32k → 22%SHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL: $5k → 22%ROBINSON RESCUE: $15k → 22%LOUISIANA FILM PRIZE FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%ROBINSON RESCUE: $15k → 22%ROBINSON FILM CENTER: $5k → 22%CE BYRD: $15k → 22%SHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL: $5k → 22%CE BYRD: $8k → 22%COMMUNITY RENEWAL: $3k → 22%ROBINSON RESCUE: $5k → 22%COMMUNITY RENEWAL: $3k → 22%BYRD HIGHSCHOOL: $5k → 22%COMMUNITY RENEWAL: $3k → 22%THE CARPENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$358k · 9 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$358k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-19%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    Red River Film Society Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $181k · revenue +4%
  • RR
    ROBINSONS RESCUE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $67k · revenue +30%
  • CHIMP HAVEN INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $11k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • GF
    GBSCIDP FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -19%
  • UL
    US LUSITANO ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • BH
    BYRD HIGHSCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana Spca Foundation Inc

To be operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform functions of and to carry out the purposes of the louisiana society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, which operates to prevent cruelty to animals.

Animals
2
Shreveport Chamber of Commerce

Shreveport chamber of commerce provides various projects thoughout the year for chamber members.

3
Greater Shreveport Chamber Foundation

Assistance in economic development.

Community Improvement
4
Lsu Health Sciences Foundation in Shreveport

The sole mission of the foundation is to support, enhance and assist the lsu health sciences center at shreveport in its many endeavors.

Philanthropy
5
Rescue Rehome Repeat of South Louisiana

Adoption of amimals

Animals
6
Shreveport Common Inc

Shreveport Common Inc mission is to facilitate public/private partnerships to implement the Shreveport Common Vision Plan for an Arts-Inspired revitalization of Shreveport Common to an UNcommon Creative Cultural Community.

Community Improvement
7
Beauregard Health System Foundation Inc

To assist in improving healthcare in Beauregard Parish, Louisiana.

Health
8
Dogwood Animal Shelter Inc

Humane Treatment of all animals and to enhance the Human-Animal bond

Animals
9
Lsu Health Sciences Building Foundation in Shreveport

All functions of the foundation are dedicated to supporting lsu health sciences center at shreveport.

Education
10
Rescue Revolution of Mississippi

The mission of rescue revolution of mississippi is to maximize the extent to which the purpose is to help rescue, love, rehabilitate, and find new homes for rescued animals, providing education, and promoting people to spay and neuter…

Animals
11
Desoto Hospital Association Inc Dba Desoto Regional Health System

34 bed hospital located in a medically underserved parish in northwest louisiana. includes three rural health clinics,24 hour emergency services, industrial medicine clinic, and wellness/therapy center.

Health
12
Mississippi Animal Rescue League

Aquisition and care for homeless and abused animals prevention of cruelty to animals through education

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Arkansas & North Louisiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bff of Desoto Animal Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Red River Film Society Inc — $180,500 · Arts & CultureRed River Film Society IncSHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL — $10,000 · Arts & CultureROBINSONS RESCUE INC — $67,334 · AnimalsROBINSONS RESCUE INCBFF of Desoto Animal Services Inc — $26,000 · AnimalsBFF of Desoto Animal Services …CHIMP HAVEN INC — $10,650 · AnimalsCHIMP HAVEN INCIndividual grant recipient — $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant reci…LOUISIANA FILM PRIZE FOUNDATION — $20,750 · OtherLOUISIANA FILM PRIZE …NODCC — $12,500 · OtherNODCCUS LUSITANO ASSOCIATION — $5,000 · OtherUS LUSITANO ASSOCIATI…BYRD HIGHSCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherBYRD HIGHSCHOOLTHE CARPENTER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · OtherTHE CARPENTER FOUNDAT…Individual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC — $7,500 · Community ImprovementGBSCIDP FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC — $2,500 · HealthINDEPENDENCE BOWL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$190,500Animals$103,984Other$75,750Community Improvement$7,500Health$7,500Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRed River Film Society Inc — $180,500 over 4y, 16% of budgetROBINSONS RESCUE INC — $67,334 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetBFF of Desoto Animal Services Inc — $26,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC — $10,650 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGBSCIDP FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDEPENDENCE BOWL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North LouisianaLA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · The Powers Foundation Inc · The Nelson Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William a Robinson Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William a Robinson Private Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William a Robinson Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph