Skip to content

· Private foundation

Willayne E Towe Christian Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$110kYouth Development$85kReligion$79kHousing & Shelter$47kRecreation & Sports$39kInternational$36kHuman Services$34kPhilanthropy$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESTORATION HOUSE$10,000
WIDOWED PARENT RELIEF PROJECT$10,000
KNOXVILLE INNER CITY KIDS OUTREACH$10,000
STREET HOPE TN$10,000
SUSANNAH'S HOUSE$10,000
ISAIAH 117 HOUSE$7,500
THRIVE MINISTRY$7,500
HAND UP FOR WOMEN$7,500
PUNCHWORX$5,000
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OAK RIDGE$5,000
CEDARBROOK OUTREACH INC$5,000
YOUTH WITH A MISSION$5,000
MANE SUPPORT$5,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF KNOXVILLE$5,000
THE CROSS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $8k → 18%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$419k · 19 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
5

Total granted

$419k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+39%

Still filing today

58%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KI
    KNOXVILLE INNER CITY KIDS OUTR
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +213%
  • SH
    STREET HOPE TN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +28%
  • SH
    SUSANNAH'S HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • WL
    WEST LONSDALE BAPTIST CHILDCARE CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CARE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • WV
    WEARS VALLEY RANCH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Mend House Sober Living Community

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health
2
Kingdom Pillars

Empowering women to wholeness and self-worth with providing a safe haven.

Public Benefit
3
His House Outreach Ministries Inc Dba She Brews Coffee & Transition Prog

We equip and empower women transitioning out of incarceration by providing stable employment and housing, life skills, and mentors to walk alongside them. Through this, we inspire hope, disrupt cycles of incarceration, and restore families.

Housing & Shelter
4
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
5
The House That Mercy Built

Faith based residential program that will provide a safe environment for women to be transformed from teh inside out. a place that helps women bring order, accountability, and a strong spiritual foundation where there has been chaos, lack…

Religion
6
Selah Life Choices Inc

We exist to serve women who have been trafficked. through our confidential services, we offer a safe space for healing to begin while we compassionately reflect jesus to all we encounter.

Human Services
7
Travis House Inc

The mission of the Travis House is to free men and women from the bonds of addiction. Residents develop a biblical foundation and learn recovery tools to live a healthy and productive life. We believe that having a relationship with Jesus…

Health
8
Serve People & Restore Kindred Son

Provide transitional housing for women and children to end chronic homelessness while connecting with services

Community Improvement
9
Crossroads for Her Ministry Inc

A non-denominational local christian ministry focused on providing christ-centered physical, mental and spiritual comfort to women in need. our mission is to present christ's love through the gospel as we endeavor to enrich the lives of…

Religion
10
Redemption House Ministries

Transitional shelter for women, men and children for central oregon. to provide shelter and a safe place for hope.

Human Services
11
His Helping Hands Ministries

Provide safe housing and training to women who were victims of addiction,sex trafficking, abuse, homelesness or previously incarcerated.

Religion
12
Lifehouse Ministries Inc
Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Isaiah 117 House; the most unlike its peers is Cross Food Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST LONSDALE BAPTIST CHURCH: $51,000 · OtherWEST LONSDALE BAPTIST CHURCHLIGHTING THE WAY INTERNATIONAL: $33,500 · OtherLIGHTING THE WAY INTERNATIONALCEDARBROOK OUTREACH INC: $23,000 · OtherCEDARBROOK OUTREACH INCYOUTH WITH A MISSION: $17,000 · OtherYOUTH WITH A MISSIONUNITED WAY CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INC: $14,000 · OtherUNITED WAY CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INCKNOXVILLE-KNOX COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER: $11,000 · OtherKNOXVILLE-KNOX COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERCREEKSIDE BIBLE CHURCH: $8,000 · OtherTHRIVE MINISTRY: $7,500 · Other+5 more: $17,500 · Other+5 moreKNOXVILLE INNER CITY KIDS OUTR: $41,500 · Youth DevelopmentKNOXVILLE INNER …GIRLS INCORPORATED OF TENNESSEE VALLEY: $26,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORAT…SUSANNAH'S HOUSE INC: $28,000 · HealthSUSANNAH'S HOUS…MIRACLE LAKE INC: $14,500 · HealthMIRACLE LAKE IN…MANE SUPPORT INC: $13,000 · HealthMANE SUPPORT IN…PUNCHWORX INC: $8,000 · HealthPUNCHWORX INCTHE RESTORATION HOUSE: $42,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE RESTORA…FAMILY PROMISE OF KNOXVILLE: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROM…VITAL FAMILIES INC: $25,000 · ReligionCROSS FOOD MINISTRY: $8,000 · ReligionSTREET HOPE TN: $31,000 · Recreation & SportsWIDOWED PARENT RELIEF PROJECT: $18,000 · Human ServicesISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $7,500 · Human ServicesWEARS VALLEY RANCH INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesHAND UP FOR WOMEN: $7,500 · Philanthropy
Other$182,500Youth Development$68,000Health$63,500Housing & Shelter$47,000Religion$33,000Recreation & Sports$31,000Human Services$28,500Philanthropy$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE RESTORATION HOUSE: $42,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetKNOXVILLE INNER CITY KIDS OUTR: $41,500 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetSTREET HOPE TN: $31,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSUSANNAH'S HOUSE INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF TENNESSEE VALLEY: $26,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetVITAL FAMILIES INC: $25,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetWIDOWED PARENT RELIEF PROJECT: $18,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetMIRACLE LAKE INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INC: $14,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMANE SUPPORT INC: $13,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetPUNCHWORX INC: $8,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetCROSS FOOD MINISTRY: $8,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RESTORATION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds KNOXVILLE INNER CITY KIDS OUTR ↗
  • Who funds STREET HOPE TN ↗
  • Who funds SUSANNAH'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF TENNESSEE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds VITAL FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WIDOWED PARENT RELIEF PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds MANE SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds PUNCHWORX INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSS FOOD MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds HAND UP FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF KNOXVILLE ↗
  • Who funds WEARS VALLEY RANCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gene & Florence Monday Foundation IncTN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gene & Florence Monday Foundation Inc · Trinity Health Foundation of East Tennessee · The Clayton Homes Foundation · East Tennessee Foundation · Graham Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Willayne E Towe Christian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willayne E Towe Christian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Willayne E Towe Christian Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Willayne E Towe Christian Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Willayne E Towe Christian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph