Skip to content

· Private foundation

Willard Lowell Hendershott Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$358kFood & Nutrition$90kEducation$81kCrime & Legal$55kAnimals$51kEnvironment$24kRecreation & Sports$20kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$54,500
Family Crisis Center$42,650
Big Bend Shooting Foundation$20,000
Food Pantry of Alpine$10,000
Alpine Christian School$10,000
Casa Hogar Orphanage$5,000
Big Bend Community Baseball Inc$5,000
Friends of Big Bend Ranch$4,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $79k → 14%Family Crisis Center: $43k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $40k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $17k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$995k · 13 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$995k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+70%

Still filing today

46%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $179k · revenue +8%
  • SH
    Sunshine House Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $156k · revenue +75%
  • AH
    ALPINE HUMANE SOCIETY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $47k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • AM
    ALPINE MONTESSORI INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +5%
  • AN
    ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +75%
  • AP
    Alpine Public Library Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alpine Watershed Group

Watershed collaboration and stewardship

Environment
2
Alpine School District Foundation

To provide funding for Alpine School District schools and students.

Education
3
Alpine Trails Foundation

Trail maintenance

—
4
Accessible Alpine Adventure Tours
Health
5
Alpine Skating Club

Further the sport of figure skating to the international level

Recreation & Sports
6
Adventist Mountain Missions
Religion
7
Alaska Avalanche School Inc

The mission of the Alaska Avalanche School is to provide exceptional experience-based avalanche safety education to all users of the mountain environment.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Incline Schools Academic Excellence Foundation
—
9
High Rockies Community School

Our mission is to provide individualized educational options where students and teachers engage in playful, exploratory learning by creating a culture of collaboration in a safe, diverse, multi-age environment. Our students are encouraged…

Education
10
The Alpaca Research Foundation

The alpaca research foundation has been dedicated to funding medical and scientific research aimed at improving the health and vitality of north american alpacas. only research that is conducted and evaluated under the peer-review process…

Philanthropy
11
John Hancock Charter School Foundation

In partnership with parents, the community, and in cooperation with Alpine School District, the School's purpose is to provide continuously challenging curriculum in a safe and nurturing learning environment. Our primary goal is to instill…

Education
12
American Friends of the Everest Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alpine Christian School; the most unlike its peers is Alpine Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $241,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSunshine House Inc: $156,250 · OtherSunshine House IncIndividual grant recipient: $92,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALPINE FOOD PANTRY: $54,867 · OtherALPINE FOOD PANTRYBIG BEND SHOOTING FOUNDATION: $54,000 · OtherBIG BEND SHOOTING FOUNDATIONCASA HOGAR ORPHANAGE: $22,500 · Other+8 more: $39,000 · Other+8 moreFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $178,545 · Human ServicesFAMILY CRISIS CENTE…ALPINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $63,000 · EducationALPINE MONTESSORI INC: $10,000 · EducationAlpine Public Library Association Inc: $5,000 · EducationALPINE HUMANE SOCIETY: $46,500 · AnimalsFOOD PANTRY OF ALPINE: $35,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK: $23,500 · PhilanthropyADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$660,867Human Services$178,545Education$78,000Animals$46,500Food & Nutrition$35,000Philanthropy$23,500Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $178,545 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetSunshine House Inc: $156,250 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetALPINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $63,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetALPINE HUMANE SOCIETY: $46,500 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetFOOD PANTRY OF ALPINE: $35,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK: $23,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetALPINE MONTESSORI INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Sunshine House Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALPINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ALPINE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD PANTRY OF ALPINE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK ↗
  • Who funds ALPINE MONTESSORI INC ↗
  • Who funds ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Alpine Public Library Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Permian Basin Area FoundationTX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Permian Basin Area Foundation · James a Buddy Davidson Charitable Foundation · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Willard Lowell Hendershott Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willard Lowell Hendershott Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Willard Lowell Hendershott Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Willard Lowell Hendershott Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Willard Lowell Hendershott’s filings →

    More from the funding graph