Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Will R Beitel Children's Community Fdn

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$917k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$917k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Human Services$1.0MYouth Development$134kHealth$33kHousing & Shelter$24kEducation$17k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$916,809
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Greater Valley YMCA$916,809
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Lehigh Valley Children's Centers: $5k → 11%Lehigh Valley Children's Centers: $5k → 11%Turning Point of the Lehigh Valley: $4k → 11%Lehigh Valley Children's Centers: $4k → 11%Lehigh Valley Children's Centers: $3k → 11%Project of Easton: $9k → 11%Project of Easton: $9k → 11%Project of Easton: $9k → 11%Project of Easton: $8k → 11%Project of Easton: $8k → 11%Families First: $5k → 11%Families First: $5k → 11%Families First: $5k → 11%Families First: $4k → 11%Families First: $4k → 11%Center for Vision Loss: $7k → 11%Center for Vision Loss: $7k → 11%Center for Vision Loss: $7k → 11%Center for Vision Loss: $7k → 11%Center for Vision Loss: $6k → 11%Northeast Ministry: $5k → 11%Northeast Ministry: $5k → 11%Northeast Ministry: $5k → 11%Northeast Ministry: $4k → 11%Northeast Ministry: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$1.2M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+97%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PROJECT OF EASTON INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $43k · revenue +89%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR HUMANISTIC CHANGE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $42k · revenue +49%
  • SF
    SIGHTS FOR HOPE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $33k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • TP
    TURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +97%
  • PF
    Pinebrook Family Services
    one grant, 2017 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Services for Children Inc

Csc prepares young children and their families to succeed in learning and life through innovative, comprehensive, leading edge services.

Education
2
Lehigh Valley Consumerfamily Satisfac- Tion Team D/B/a Recovery Partnership

To collect information from consumers and families of individuals in the mental health care system and report on their level of satisfaction with these services, in order to achieve a better understanding of how to serve these individuals…

Human Services
3
North Penn Valley Boys and Girls Club Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their fullest potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
4
Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation (Lvedc)

The mission of the lehigh valley economic development corporation is to market the economic assets of the lehigh valley and to create partnerships to support the recruitment, growth and retention of employers, and the creation of jobs for…

Community Improvement
5
Family Care Centers Inc

Establish and maintain a medical group consisting of clinicians employed by lehigh valley health network, part of jefferson health. this medical group will fulfill the charitable mission of promoting community health through health…

6
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Virginia Peninsula Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
7
Via of the Lehigh Valley Inc

To help people reach their full potential through a rewarding career, meaningful relationships, and an enriching community life. Via creates pathways to success through vocation, inclusion, and advocacy.

Human Services
8
Children First Pa

Summary

Human Services
9
Ywca Lancaster

The ywca lancaster is a nonprofit organization with a mission to eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

10
Hanover Area Ymca

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

11
Ligonier Valley Learning Center Inc

To provide education and counseling services to children

12
Child Development Council of Northeastern Pa Inc

The child development council of northeastern pa, inc. was established to provide child care and nutritional services to working families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Humanistic Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is Families First Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $931,809 · OtherGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONCENTER FOR HUMANISTIC CHANGE INC — $41,590 · Other+6 more — $89,311 · Other+6 morePROJECT OF EASTON INC — $43,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT OF E…SIGHTS FOR HOPE — $32,800 · Human ServicesSIGHTS FOR H…FAMILIES FIRST INC — $21,500 · Human ServicesFAMILIES FIR…NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER — $21,500 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST CO…LEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC — $16,000 · Human ServicesLEHIGH VALLE…+1 more — $3,700 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EASTON INC — $43,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,062,710Human Services$138,500Youth Development$43,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $931,809 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetPROJECT OF EASTON INC — $43,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EASTON INC — $43,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMANISTIC CHANGE INC — $41,590 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSIGHTS FOR HOPE — $32,800 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST INC — $21,500 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER — $21,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC — $3,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds PROJECT OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HUMANISTIC CHANGE INC
  • Who funds SIGHTS FOR HOPE
  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INC
  • Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds LEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC
  • Who funds TURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Greater Lehigh ValleyPA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Ross J Born and Wendy G Born Charitable Trust · The Provident Bank Foundation · Frank E Payne and Seba B Payne Foundation · Sylvia Perkin Perpetual Charitable Trust · Essa Bank & Trust Foundation · Harry C Trexler Estate · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · William H and Patti a Lehr Foundation · The Rider-Pool Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Will R Beitel Children's Community Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Will R Beitel Children's Community Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Will R Beitel Children's Community Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph