Skip to content

· Private foundation

Will Heginbotham Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$493kEducation$177kHuman Services$172kHealth$155kArts & Culture$92kPublic Benefit$80kCommunity Improvement$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $96k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLYOKE SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1J$40,000
CITY OF HOLYOKE$35,000
LITTLE SPROUTS LEARNING CENTER$10,800
GOLDEN PLAINS RECREATION INC -$10,000
BABY BEAR HUGS$7,000
THE BRIDGE FOUNDATION$6,200
COLORADO VIRTUAL LIBRARY-CO LIBRARY$5,944
NORTHEAST CO HEALTH DEPARTMENT$5,500
PHILLIPS COUNTY FAMILY EDUCATION$3,000
CO ASSOC FOR FAMILY AND COMMUNITY$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LITTLE SPROUTS LEARNING CENTER: $11k → 11%HOLYOKE CHILD CARE INITIATIVE: $10k → 11%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 11%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 11%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 11%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 11%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 11%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 11%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 11%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 11%BABY BEAR HUGS: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$898k · 19 repeat orgs$387k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
25

Total granted

$898k
$371k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+371%

Still filing today

16%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    Regional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs
    9× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +15%
  • PC
    Phillips County Economic Development Corporation
    2× · 2019–2020 · $11k · revenue +44%
  • PC
    Phillips County Family Education Services
    4× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • HC
    HOLYOKE CHILDCARE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2021 · $90k
  • CO
    CITY OF HOLYOKEHEGINBOTHAM LIBRARY
    one grant, 2019 · $51k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hollis Preschool

We are a playbased preschool which provides preschool education and social training to students in our community.

Education
2
Child Education Center

Child Education Center is a licensed daycare serving children ages 6 weeks thru 6 years.

Human Services
3
Merrimack Valley Day Care Service

Daycare services

—
4
Training Wheels Childcare Center

Provide Childcare

—
5
Early Learning Coalition

To provide excellent, affordable childcare and early education that nurtures children's growth and strengthens families throughout the Denali Borough

Human Services
6
Plainville Early Learning Center Inc

Our purpose is to provide a non-discriminatory day care program to assist the healthy physical, emotional, social, and cognitive development of children thus parental care and protections are supplemented during the time a child must or…

Human Services
7
Little Sprouts Community Preschool

Provide early childhood education.

Education
8
Valley Parent Preschool

Our mission is to provide a quality preschool experience in a parent cooperative environment.

Education
9
Childrens Garden Preschool

Provide community preschool services

Human Services
10
Lakota Child Care Center

Provide safe, affordable childcare to the area.

Human Services
11
Lexington Playcare Center Inc

LPC's mission is to help children become good friends, proficient problem solvers, creative risk takers, and self-governing, accepting classmates. We want them to be as self-sufficient and independent as they can be based on their age and…

Human Services
12
Friendship Children's Center Inc

Provides Childcare for Young Children, Infant to Preschool

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phillips County Family Education Services; the most unlike its peers is Melissa Memorial Hospital Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOLYOKE: $260,000 · OtherCITY OF HOLYOKEHOLYOKE SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1J: $120,992 · OtherHOLYOKE SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1JPHILLIPS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: $100,272 · OtherPHILLIPS COUNTY COMMISSIONERSIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLYOKE CHILDCARE INITIATIVE: $90,000 · OtherHOLYOKE CHILDCARE INITIATIVEHAXTUN HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $84,473 · OtherHAXTUN HOSPITAL DISTRICTGOLDEN PLAINS RECREATION INC: $72,500 · OtherGOLDEN PLAINS RECREATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $62,262 · OtherCITY OF HOLYOKEHEGINBOTHAM LIBRARY: $51,000 · Other+31 more: $233,833 · Other+31 moreRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs: $63,000 · Human ServicesLittle Sprouts Learning Center: $10,800 · Human ServicesHolyoke Community Childcare: $10,000 · Human ServicesPhillips County Economic Development Corporation: $11,200 · Community ImprovementPhillips County Family Education Services: $10,500 · EducationMELISSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $5,000 · Health
Other$1,175,332Human Services$83,800Community Improvement$11,200Education$10,500Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs: $63,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetPhillips County Economic Development Corporation: $11,200 over 2y, 11% of budgetPhillips County Family Education Services: $10,500 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetHolyoke Community Childcare: $10,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetMELISSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDragon's Wagon Preschool: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Regional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs ↗
  • Who funds Phillips County Economic Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Little Sprouts Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds Phillips County Family Education Services ↗
  • Who funds Holyoke Community Childcare ↗
  • Who funds MELISSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Holyoke Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds Dragon's Wagon Preschool ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Temple Hoyne Buell FoundationCO15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Boettcher Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Will Heginbotham Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Will Heginbotham Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Will Heginbotham’s filings →

    More from the funding graph