Skip to content

· Private foundation

Widows Mite Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$17kReligion$17kInternational$12kArts & Culture$7kPhilanthropy$6kHuman Services$6kEnvironment$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
13
States reached
$628k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,500
SANDSCREST FOUNDATION$2,000
BEREA COLLEGE$2,000
CNEWA$2,000
YWCA WHEELING$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
YOUTH SERVICE SYSTEM INC$1,500
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$1,500
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$1,000
ST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,000
BETHANY COLLEGE$1,000
CHAPEL HILL CHRISTIAN CHURCH$1,000
BECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YWCA WHEELING: $2k → 15%YOUTH SERVICE SYSTEM INC: $2k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $2k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $1k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $1k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $1k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $500 → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $500 → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $500 → 15%YOUTH SERVICE SYSTEM INC: $500 → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
IN
PA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Widows Mite Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Widows Mite Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$88k · 41 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
10

Total granted

$88k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+5%

Still filing today

46%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BETHANY COLLEGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +3%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF THE SACRED CROSS
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE ANGELS MONASTERY
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • WH
    WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Virginia Wesleyan University

Virginia wesleyan university is a fully accredited liberal arts, united-methodist related institution founded in 1961.

—
3
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
4
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
5
William & Mary Foundation

The William & Mary Foundation advances the university's highest aspirations by securing private support, guiding a multi-asset investment portfolio, and offering strategic leadership. In this work, we propel the university toward national…

Education
6
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
7
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
8
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
9
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
10
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
11
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
12
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wheeling Symphony Orchestra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC INC: $5,000 · OtherCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC INCST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $4,500 · OtherST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHLAWRENCEFIELD PARISH CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherLAWRENCEFIELD PARISH CHURCHOHIO COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $4,000 · OtherOHIO COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARYTHE SOCIETY OF THE SACRED CROSS: $3,910 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF THE SACRED CROSSFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $2,800 · OtherWHEELING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $2,300 · Other+34 more: $30,600 · Other+34 moreBETHANY COLLEGE: $7,500 · EducationBETHANY COLLEGEBEREA COLLEGE: $4,500 · EducationBEREA COLLEGEAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $3,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN C…WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,400 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNI…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $700 · Education+2 more: $600 · EducationYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV: $4,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOME…YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERV…FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesFAITH IN A…THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE …BECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION INC: $5,900 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $3,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 · InternationalPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA: $1,400 · Arts & CultureThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF BLACKWATER INC: $1,450 · EnvironmentOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $1,250 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $500 · Environment+1 more: $100 · Environment
Other$62,610Education$17,700Human Services$10,500Philanthropy$8,900International$7,000Arts & Culture$3,900Environment$3,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION INC: $5,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV: $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,500 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BLACKWATER INC: $1,450 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA: $1,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABLE FAMILIES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WEST VIRGINIA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF WHEELING INC: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILL MUSEUM & MANUSCRIPT LIBRARY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV ↗
  • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Sandscrest Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BLACKWATER INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WQED MULTIMEDIA ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer FoundationWV22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · Hess Family Foundation · Vna Home Support Services Inc · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee · Harry and Helen Sands Charitable Trust · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · River Valley Health Foundation · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · The Driehorst Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Widows Mite Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Widows Mite Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Widows Mite’s filings →

More from the funding graph