Skip to content

· Private foundation

Whitener Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$565k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$695kArts & Culture$374kCrime & Legal$334kCommunity Improvement$260kHuman Services$195kFood & Nutrition$185kYouth Development$160kHealth$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $375k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIBLE TRAINING CENTER FOR PASTORS$100,000
ABILENE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$85,000
Individual grant recipient$80,000
FELLOWSHIP OF COMPANIES FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL$60,000
LANTERN PROJECT$50,000
BIG COUNTRY CASA$25,000
CHRISTIAN HOMES$20,000
PREGNANCY RESOURCES$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FIRST BAPTIST SANTA FE$20,000
NOAH PROJECT$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FABER INSTITUTE$10,000
WEST TEXAS REHABILITATION CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MEN OF NEMIAH: $5k → 14%NOROC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
OH
NM
AR
NC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 14 repeat orgs$638k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
20

Total granted

$1.9M
$328k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+27%

Still filing today

43%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $310k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    Fellowship of Companies For Christ
    5× · 2020–2024 · $230k · revenue +49%
  • BC
    BIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $177k · revenue +2%
  • FO
    FIELDS OF WHEAT INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $75k · revenue +381%

Funded once

  • AH
    ABILENE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SANTA FE
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • N
    NDCC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Reach Out Inc

Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.

Health
2
Texarkana Baptist Orphanage

Care of neglected children

Human Services
3
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
4
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
5
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
6
A Faithful Presence

A faithful presence afp is an organization that provides holistic spiritual care, community building, and trauma-informed advocacy for our formerly homeless neighbors while training other communities to do the same.

Religion
7
Austin City Lutherans

Address food and housing insecurity for Austin-area low income families.

Religion
8
Faithworks of Abilene Inc

Our mission is to help the underemployed, through personal, career, academic and spiritual development, acquire the confidence and skills for gainful and long-term employment.

Education
9
The Sanctuary Foster Care Services

Achieving permanent sanctuary and healing homes for children and families from hard places.

Human Services
10
Compassion Ministries of Waco

It is the mission of the organization to provide services to disadvantaged and homeless families with children; to reintegrate homeless families with children into permanent housing and employment.

Community Improvement
11
Waco Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. waco habitat for humanity adheres to a…

Housing & Shelter
12
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Homes of Abilene Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cappella Romana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIBLE TRAINING CENTER FOR PASTORS: $556,000 · OtherBIBLE TRAINING CENTER FOR PASTORSFellowship of Companies For Christ: $230,000 · OtherFellowship of Companies For ChristIMAGINE MINISTRIES: $185,000 · OtherIMAGINE MINISTRIESTHE ARTS OF PERFORMANCE: $160,000 · OtherTHE ARTS OF PERFORMANCENOAH PROJECT INC: $115,000 · OtherNOAH PROJECT INCVICTIMS CRISIS CENTER: $106,415 · OtherPREGNANCY RESOURCES: $105,000 · OtherABILENE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $85,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $77,000 · OtherABILENE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Other+23 more: $345,500 · Other+23 moreBIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $177,332 · Crime & LegalBIG COUNT…The Lantern Project Inc: $50,000 · Crime & LegalThe Lante…SWEETWATER HOUSE OF PEACE: $85,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIELDS OF WHEAT INC: $74,568 · Youth DevelopmentChristian Homes of Abilene Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesNOROC INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE: $15,000 · Arts & CultureOREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureGRACE MUSEUM INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE: $20,000 · PhilanthropyFABER INSTITUTE: $10,000 · ReligionWITNESS BREAKTHROUGH INC: $3,000 · Religion
Other$2,119,915Crime & Legal$227,332Youth Development$159,568Human Services$35,000Arts & Culture$21,500Philanthropy$20,000Religion$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFellowship of Companies For Christ: $230,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetBIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $177,332 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetNOAH PROJECT INC: $115,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetSWEETWATER HOUSE OF PEACE: $85,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetFIELDS OF WHEAT INC: $74,568 over 4y, 19% of budgetThe Lantern Project Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCAPPELLA ROMANA: $25,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetChristian Homes of Abilene Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE REFUGE FOR DMST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFABER INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNOROC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetThe West Texas Rehabilitation Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Abilene Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWITNESS BREAKTHROUGH INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetGRACE MUSEUM INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fellowship of Companies For Christ ↗
  • Who funds BIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds NOAH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SWEETWATER HOUSE OF PEACE ↗
  • Who funds FIELDS OF WHEAT INC ↗
  • Who funds The Lantern Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAPPELLA ROMANA ↗
  • Who funds Christian Homes of Abilene Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE REFUGE FOR DMST ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FABER INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NOROC INC ↗
  • Who funds The West Texas Rehabilitation Center ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity Abilene Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEN OF NEHEMIAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barber FoundationTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barber Foundation · Shelton Family Foundation · Greathouse Foundation · The Legett Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Moss Adamson Spalding Charities · The Massey Family Charitable Trust · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · The Robison Excelsior Foundation · Community Foundation of Abilene · Jm Parker Foundation · Claude & Mae Moss Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Whitener Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Whitener Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Cappella Romana: 4% of income from government
  • Oregon Repertory Singers: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Whitener Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph