Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wheless Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$689k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$966kHuman Services$544kReligion$519kFood & Nutrition$480kEducation$365kPublic Safety & Disaster$336kCommunity Improvement$225kRecreation & Sports$190kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k35 grants · $635k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL$45,000
FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA$35,000
GLEASON INITIATIVE FOUNDATION$35,000
CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS$30,000
TISCH BRAIN TUMOR CENTER AT DUKE$30,000
CHASTAIN PARK THERAPEUTIC RIDING$30,000
DURHAM ACADEMY INC$30,000
YMCA$30,000
COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE OF NW LA$30,000
UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION$30,000
GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION$20,000
VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER$20,000
ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST$20,000
MIT$20,000
CHIMP HAVEN$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $386k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%RENESTING PROJECT INC: $3k → 13%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $10k → 22%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $10k → 22%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $10k → 22%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $10k → 22%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $10k → 22%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $10k → 22%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $5k → 22%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $5k → 22%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $20k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $15k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $15k → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $15k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $15k → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $15k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $15k → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $15k → 12%THE GLEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM: $20k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $15k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $15k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $15k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $15k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $15k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $13k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MA
CT
CO
NM
TN
NC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 41 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
10

Total granted

$4.1M
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+9%

Still filing today

59%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    NORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK
    8× · 2018–2025 · $280k · revenue +31%
  • CR
    COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $225k · revenue +95%
  • TG
    TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +182%

Funded once

  • TG
    The Glen Retirement System
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +9%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUISIANA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +65%
  • CA
    CUMBERLAND ACADEMY OF GEORGIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
2
Louisiana Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Dedicated to the elimination of animal suffering by providing care and basic medical services for homeless and unwanted animals with the mission to promote, protect, and advance the well-being of louisiana's companion animals.

Animals
3
University of New Orleans Foundation

The University of New Orleans Foundation's mission is to promote the well-being and advancement of the University of New Orleans and all the colleges, schools, departments, and divisions comprising it, and to develop, expand, and improve…

Education
4
Humane Society of South Mississippi

The mission of the humane society is to save and enhance the lives of pets through cooperative and innovative approaches to adoption, spay/neuter, sheltering and community engagement.

Animals
5
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
6
Lsu Health Sciences Foundation in Shreveport

The sole mission of the foundation is to support, enhance and assist the lsu health sciences center at shreveport in its many endeavors.

Philanthropy
7
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
8
Louisiana State Bar Association

The mission of the louisiana state bar association is to assist its members in the practice of law, assure access to and aid in the administration of justice, assist the supreme court in the regulation of the practice of law, uphold the…

—
9
Louisiana Spca Foundation Inc

To be operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform functions of and to carry out the purposes of the louisiana society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, which operates to prevent cruelty to animals.

Animals
10
Goodwill Industries of North La Inc

Enhance the dignity and quality of life for individuals, families, and communities by eliminating barriers to opportunity and helping people in need reach their fullest potential through employment and workforce development…

Employment
11
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
12
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lsu in Shreveport Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Savannah College of Art and DesignInc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/44
Grantees still filing
30/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $304,000 · OtherST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CATHEDRALAMERICAN RED CROSS: $255,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSYMCA: $215,200 · OtherYMCACHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS: $215,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSSCOUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE OF NW LA: $181,000 · OtherCOUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE OF NW LACHASTAIN PARK THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $180,000 · OtherCHASTAIN PARK THERAPEUTIC RIDINGTISCH BRAIN TUMOR CENTER AT DUKE: $155,000 · OtherTISCH BRAIN TUMOR CENTER AT DUKEMIT: $100,000 · Other+32 more: $1,110,000 · Other+32 moreTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $180,200 · Human ServicesTEAM GLEASON F…ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $125,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE DOG…CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $88,000 · Human ServicesCADDO COUNCIL …THE FOOD DEPOT: $80,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOTHOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I: $70,000 · Human ServicesHOLY ANGELS RE…The Glen Retirement System: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK: $280,000 · Food & NutritionDURHAM ACADEMY INC: $120,000 · EducationUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · EducationOGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC: $20,000 · EducationCUMBERLAND ACADEMY OF GEORGIA INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10,000 · EducationGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $225,000 · Community ImprovementPROVIDENCE HOUSE: $10,000 · Community ImprovementROBINSONS RESCUE INC: $110,000 · AnimalsCHIMP HAVEN INC: $40,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUISIANA INC: $10,000 · Animals+2 more: $10,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF LOUISIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $85,000 · Arts & CultureSHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL: $55,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,715,200Human Services$566,200Food & Nutrition$280,000Education$245,000Community Improvement$235,000Animals$170,000Arts & Culture$140,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK: $280,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $225,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $180,200 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $125,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetDURHAM ACADEMY INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetROBINSONS RESCUE INC: $110,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $90,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $88,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF LOUISIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $85,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetVOLUNTEERS FOR YOUTH JUSTICE: $80,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMAGNOLIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $75,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I: $70,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEsperanza Shelter Inc: $70,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetOakwood Home for Women Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL: $55,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $45,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE PAIDEIA SCHOOL INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetShreveport Bossier Rescue Mission: $33,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING SANTA FE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetGINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Glen Retirement System: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUISIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCUMBERLAND ACADEMY OF GEORGIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRENZI EDUCATION & ART CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLSU IN SHREVEPORT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRENESTING PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNORWELA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 215: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBINSONS RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LOUISIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS FOR YOUTH JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds MAGNOLIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I ↗
  • Who funds Esperanza Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds Oakwood Home for Women Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE PAIDEIA SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Shreveport Bossier Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SANTA FE INC ↗
  • Who funds GINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North LouisianaLA40.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Grayson Foundation Inc · The Powers Foundation Inc · Willis-Knighton Medical Center · American Electric Power Foundation · The Alta and John Franks Foundation · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · The Crow Foundation · United Way of Northwest Louisiana · The Frost Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wheless Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wheless Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wheless Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Wheless Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wheless’ filings →

More from the funding graph