Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wheeler Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$748k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$3.4MEmployment$765kHuman Services$215kHealth$132kFood & Nutrition$50kRecreation & Sports$29kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $503k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$43,182
Median grant
2
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$748,000
CARLE HEALTH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY$462,874
VERMILION ASSOCIATION FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION$377,964
CROSSPOINT HUMAN SERVICES$202,419
DANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$175,000
IROQUOIS SPECIAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$73,592
DANVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT$52,358
EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$45,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$45,000
DONOVAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$43,182
GEORGETOWN RIDGE FARM CUSD #4$25,559
IROQUOIS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT #9$16,741
OAKWOOD CUSD #76$14,073
COVINGTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION$8,631
HOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICES CENTER$6,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER: $45k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Wheeler Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 85%.

Wheeler Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 13 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$3.3M
$348k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-1%

Still filing today

31%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $987k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEmploymentHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +24%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $165k · revenue +74%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $88k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • IS
    IROQUOIS SPECIAL EDUCATION ASSOCIAT
    one grant, 2021 · $82k
  • WE
    WORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -49%
  • HR
    HUMAN RESOURCES CENTER OF EDGARCLARK COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $72k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
2
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
3
Illinois Agricultural Leadership Foundation

To develop knowledgeable and effective leaders to become policy and decision makers for the agricultural industry.

Public Benefit
4
Energy Education Council

Enhancing lives by promoting the safe & efficient use of electricity.

Education
5
Executive Service Corps of Chicago

Executive Service Corps is the premier nonprofit consultancy that engages highly skilled professionals who use their experience and expertise to provide nonprofits with the consulting services they need to be successful. Our vision is to…

Community Improvement
6
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
7
The Arc of Illinois

The Arc of Illinois is committed to empowering persons with disabilities to achieve full participation in community life through informed choices.

—
8
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Foundation

The siue foundation exists to support the mission, vision, and values of southern illinois university edwardsville. on behalf of the university, the foundation provides fundraising coordination and implementation, serves as the steward for…

Education
9
Depaul Group Inc

DePaul Group, Inc. is a parent corporation that provides administrative support to further the strategic purposes and missions of affliated 501(c)3 corporations and affilated for profit corporations which DePaul Group is the sole…

—
10
Illinois Valley Community College Foundation

To assist in providing educational opportunitites.

Education
11
Chicago Dental Society Foundation

Improve oral health by providing funds for dental education and access to care programs

Philanthropy
12
Illinois Stewardship Alliance

The purpose of the illinois stewardship alliance is to promote the ecologically sustainable, economically viable, socially just, local food systems through policy development, advocacy, and education.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hoopeston Multi Agency Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VERMILION ASSOCIATION FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION: $636,155 · OtherVERMILION ASSOCIATION FOR SPECIAL EDUCATIONWORKSOURCE: $618,000 · OtherWORKSOURCECARLE HEALTH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY: $462,874 · OtherCARLE HEALTH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPYIROQUOIS SPECIAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $225,431 · OtherIROQUOIS SPECIAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONTHE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY: $87,881 · Other+20 more: $504,448 · Other+20 moreILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,410,000 · EducationILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $175,000 · EducationDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $165,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation+1 more: $45,000 · EducationCROSSPOINT: $202,419 · HealthWORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES: $75,000 · EmploymentDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY INC: $44,500 · Human Services
Other$2,534,789Education$1,795,000Health$202,419Employment$75,000Human Services$44,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,410,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCROSSPOINT: $202,419 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $165,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY: $87,881 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES: $75,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEastern Illinois University Foundation: $45,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY INC: $44,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICE: $12,175 over 2y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPOINT ↗
  • Who funds DANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds WORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES ↗
  • Who funds Eastern Illinois University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iroquois Federal Foundation IncIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of East Central Illinois · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wheeler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wheeler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wheeler Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wheeler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wheeler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph