Skip to content
Wgrc Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Wgrc Inc

To provide assistance to various community service organizations.

$192k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$111kRecreation & Sports$85kYouth Development$71kHousing & Shelter$61kHuman Services$51kEducation$51kPhilanthropy$49kFood & Nutrition$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $171,941, the rows itemized in this filing. The $191,641 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $19,700 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$9,974
Median grant
—
States reached
$829k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$70,000
FAMILY SERVICES$12,500
PACE INC$12,250
SALT AND LIGHT$10,000
DON MOYER BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$10,000
EASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK$9,974
HEALING HANDS INTERNATIONAL$8,400
Individual grant recipient$8,372
CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME$7,845
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY$7,600
DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%THE REFUGEE CENTER: $10k → 19%DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER: $15k → 19%DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY INC: $11k → 19%Developmental Services Center: $7k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$273k · 8 repeat orgs$372k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$273k
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+31%

Still filing today

100%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $172k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHAMPAIGN PARKS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $85k · revenue +157%
  • CA
    C-U AT HOME
    2× · 2020–2021 · $36k · revenue +37%
  • DM
    DON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    3× · 2018–2021 · $36k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • TC
    The Carle Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +60%
  • UN
    URBANA NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -21%
  • DB
    DAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Champaign County Community Development Corporation

Economic development within champaign county, il and surrounding communities

—
2
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Community Service Center of Northern Champaign County Inc

To support residents of northern champaign county by providing services dedicated to improving their social conditions and ensuring access to the resources they need.

Human Services
4
Citizens Utility Board

To promote the health, welfare and prosperity of all the citizens of illinois by ensuring effective and democratic representation of utility consumers.

—
5
Champaign County Chamber of Commerce

The chamber promotes and supports the business community through their program by advocating the best interests of its membership and by delivering excellence in membership services and benefits.

—
6
Community Health Partnership of Illinois

Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.

Health
7
Children's Advocates for Change

Children's advocates for change was organized to improve the lives of children in illinois by bringing about significant changes public policies and programs for children through research, policy analysis and advocacy, public education and…

Human Services
8
Chicago Community Bond Fund

Ccbf pays bond for people charged with crimes in cook county, illinois. through a revolving fund, ccbf supports individuals whose communities cannot afford to pay the bonds themselves and who have been impacted by structural violence.

Crime & Legal
9
Champaign County Humane Association

The champaign county humane association owns and operates the paws animal shelter. the mission is to provide food and shelter to abandoned and strayed animals.

Animals
10
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
11
Champaign County Economic Partnership

A public-private partnership dedicated to fostering a cooperative, county-wide approach to economic development.

—
12
Champaign-Urbana Kiwanis Club Welfare Foundation

For children to grow and learn through youth sports programs, tutoring, and other projects.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Champaign County; the most unlike its peers is Champaign County Historical Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAMILY SERVICES: $12,500 · OtherPACE INC: $12,250 · OtherSALT AND LIGHT: $10,000 · OtherYOUTH FOR CHRIST USA INC EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS CHAPTER: $10,000 · OtherDON MOYER BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $10,000 · OtherEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK: $9,974 · OtherDAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC: $18,300 · OtherDAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INCEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK: $10,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $17,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTYCHAMPAIGN-URBANA BALLET: $9,700 · OtherCHAMPAIGN COUNTY CASA INC: $10,000 · Other+12 more: $80,817 · Other+12 moreC-U AT HOME: $36,000 · Human ServicesC-U AT HOMEDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY INC: $32,867 · Human ServicesDEVELOPMENTAL S…CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL: $15,000 · Human ServicesCUNNINGHAM CHIL…EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS REFUGEE MUTUAL: $10,300 · Human ServicesEAST CENTRAL IL…CHAMPAIGN PARKS FOUNDATION: $85,000 · Recreation & SportsCHAMPAIGN PARK…DON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $35,920 · Youth DevelopmentDON MOYER …URBANA NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS CENTER: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentURBANA NEI…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHE…PARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $29,630 · EducationCHAMPAIGN PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationTHE READING GROUP: $5,973 · EducationThe Carle Foundation: $50,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $23,500 · Philanthropy
Other$280,541Human Services$94,167Recreation & Sports$85,000Youth Development$60,920Education$50,603Health$50,000Philanthropy$48,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAMPAIGN PARKS FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetThe Carle Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetC-U AT HOME: $36,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetDON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $35,920 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY INC: $32,867 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $29,630 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $23,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC: $18,300 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $17,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAMPAIGN PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetEAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS REFUGEE MUTUAL: $10,300 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAMPAIGN COUNTY CASA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetYOUTH FOR CHRIST USA INC EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS CHAPTER: $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCHAMPAIGN-URBANA BALLET: $9,700 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPrairie Center Health Systems Inc: $8,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE READING GROUP: $5,973 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetChampaign County Historical Museum: $5,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Champai…Community Foundation …The Meyer Charitable …Commerce Bancshares F…Ezra Levin FoundationIroquois Federal Foun…Eastern Illinois Food…American Water Charit…The Chicago Community…Hartmann Family Found…Raynie FoundationWilliam W Capel And E…
United Way of Champaign CountyIL43.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Champaign County · Community Foundation of East Central Illinois · The Meyer Charitable Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Ezra Levin Foundation · Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc · Eastern Illinois Foodbank · American Water Charitable Foundationinc · The Chicago Community Trust · Hartmann Family Foundation · Raynie Foundation · William W Capel And Ernest J Martin III Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wgrc Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wgrc Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wgrc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home