Skip to content
Westreet Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Westreet Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of Westreet Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Cornerstone Credit Union Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 11 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’23
4
’24
11
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$76kEducation$51kHealth$27kHuman Services$1kHousing & Shelter$1kRecreation & Sports$500International$500Religion$500
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $83k
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNERSTONE CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION$45,069
FOOD ON THE MOVE$25,000
CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALS$13,000
IRON GATE INC$1,000
THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES LTD$1,000
MAYES COUNTY HOPE COALITION$1,000
JWA OF TULSA BOYS HOME INC$500
BATTLECREEK CHURCH INC$500
THE PENCIL BOX INC$500
SAND SPRINGS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC$500
JOY IN THE CAUSE$500
LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 15% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%CORNERSTONE CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION: $45k → 5%TULSA WARRIORS HOCKEY CLUB: $500 → 9%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $2k → 13%BATTLECREEK CHURCH INC: $500 → 15%MAYES COUNTY HOPE COALITION: $1k → 18%CONNORS STATE COLLEGE: $2k → 19%CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALS: $13k → 8%JOY IN THE CAUSE: $500 → 15%CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALS: $12k → 8%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC: $500 → 15%IRON GATE INC: $1k → 15%SAND SPRINGS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $500 → 15%THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES LTD: $1k → 15%THE PENCIL BOX INC: $500 → 15%LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE: $500 → 15%SOLDIER'S WISH: $500 → 15%JWA OF TULSA BOYS HOME INC: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
2
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
3
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
4
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
5
Convenience Distributors Ok
—
6
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
7
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
8
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
9
Kipp Tulsa Academy College Prep Inc

Kipp tulsa prepares students from educationally under-served neighborhoods in tulsa, ok with the academic, character and life skills necessary for success in college and the competitive world beyond.

Education
10
Not Your Average Joe

To inspire our community by including adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the creation of exceptional coffee in an encouraging atmosphere

Employment
11
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
12
Independent Opportunties Inc of Oklahoma

Provide the highest quality residential services to people with developmental disabilities. a major part of the mission is to provide opportunities to these individuals based upon their right to a normal daily routine. specifically, it is…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network; the most unlike its peers is Mayes County Hope Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Food on the Move Inc: $75,000 · Food & NutritionFood on the Move IncCornerstone Credit Union Foundation: $45,069 · EducationCornerstone Credit Union Foundati…+2 more: $2,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $24,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NET…CONNORS STATE COLLEGE: $2,000 · OtherCONNORS STATE COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $1,500 · Other+5 more: $2,500 · Other+5 moreTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $1,000 · HealthMAYES COUNTY HOPE COALITION: $1,000 · HealthJoy in the Cause Company: $500 · HealthIRON GATE INC: $1,000 · ReligionSoldier's Wish: $500 · Public BenefitJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC: $500 · International
Food & Nutrition$75,000Education$47,069Other$30,500Health$2,500Religion$1,000Public Benefit$500International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFood on the Move Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $24,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYES COUNTY HOPE COALITION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJoy in the Cause Company: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoldier's Wish: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Pencil Box Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community Found…Grace & Franklin Bern…Ralph and Frances McG…The Gelvin FoundationThe Hardesty Family F…Oneok Foundation IncThe Anne and Henry Za…Je and le Mabee Found…Arvest FoundationTtcu Cares Foundation…Sanford P & Irene F B…The Sharna and Irvin …
Tulsa Community FoundationOK22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Gelvin Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Oneok Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Ttcu Cares Foundation Inc · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Westreet Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Westreet Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Mayes County Hope Coalition: 45% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Westreet Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Westreet Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Westreet’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home