Skip to content

· Private foundation

Westley Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$204k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$505kEnvironment$337kArts & Culture$34kInternational$30kHousing & Shelter$25kHealth$20kReligion$15kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $167k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$40,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL$40,000
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$30,000
NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS$25,000
ENGAGE GLOBALLY$12,000
COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS$10,000
SAINT ELIZABETH'S CHURCH$10,000
WASHINGTON ENGLISH CENTER$6,000
NUTRITION FACTSORG$5,000
UGANDA RURAL FUND USA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ARENA STAGE$5,000
SOME INC (SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT)$5,000
PBS$2,406
WILLIAMS COLLEGE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $10k → 12%NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $25k → 8%ARENA STAGE: $6k → 14%ENGAGE GLOBALLY: $12k → 12%CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $30k → 7%SAINT ELIZABETH'S CHURCH: $10k → 9%COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS: $10k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY BRADY UROLOGICAL INSTITUTE: $10k → 19%NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $25k → 8%DEER PARK MONASTERY: $5k → 11%ARENA STAGE: $5k → 14%ENGAGE GLOBALLY: $12k → 12%CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS: $10k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY BRADY UROLOGICAL INSTITUTE: $10k → 19%NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $25k → 8%ARENA STAGE: $5k → 14%ENGAGE GLOBALLY: $5k → 12%CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $25k → 8%ARENA STAGE: $5k → 14%ENGAGE GLOBALLY: $5k → 12%CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $25k → 8%ARENA STAGE: $5k → 14%CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $25k → 8%CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $40k → 14%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $40k → 14%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $40k → 14%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $35k → 14%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $30k → 14%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $26k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $10k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $10k → 14%ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $5k → 14%ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $5k → 14%SOME INC (SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT): $5k → 14%SOME INC (SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT): $5k → 14%SOME INC (SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT): $5k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $40k → 14%WASHINGTON ENGLISH CENTER: $6k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL: $40k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL: $40k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL: $35k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $30k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$959k · 18 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$959k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+541%

Still filing today

78%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentCivil RightsArts & CultureInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $155k · revenue +94%
  • NM
    NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +95%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $90k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • ST
    SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL INTERNATIONAL OCEAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • NC
    NORTHLAND COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -6%
  • CC
    CALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +541%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
8
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
9
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
10
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Natural Resource Governance Institute

Nrgi envisions a world where natural resources enable fair, prosperous and sustainable societies, instead of undermining them. nrgi exists because decisions about how natural resources are governed determine the well-being of people in…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Uganda Rural Fund Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $211,000 · OtherGEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICI…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL: $115,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOLSOME INC: $25,000 · OtherSOME INCJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY BRADY UROLOGICAL INSTITUTE: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $20,406 · OtherCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $155,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONNORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $150,000 · EnvironmentNORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNES…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $21,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $90,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSIT…Engage Globally: $35,000 · EducationEngage GloballyCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC: $20,000 · EducationCOLLEGIATE DIRECTION…WASHINGTON ENGLISH CENTER: $17,000 · EducationWASHINGTON ENGLISH C…Williams College: $13,000 · EducationWilliams College+2 more: $4,000 · EducationWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureUGANDA RURAL FUND USA INC: $30,000 · InternationalNutritionfactsorg Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION: $500 · Civil Rights
Other$391,406Environment$336,000Education$179,000Arts & Culture$30,000International$30,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Civil Rights$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $150,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEngage Globally: $35,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUGANDA RURAL FUND USA INC: $30,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSOME INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON ENGLISH CENTER: $17,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWilliams College: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNutritionfactsorg Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHLAND COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Engage Globally ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UGANDA RURAL FUND USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON ENGLISH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Nutritionfactsorg Inc ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Westley Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Westley Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Westley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph