Skip to content

· Public charity

Western States Center Inc

The mission of western states center is to work with communities and organizations to build movements, develop leaders, shift culture, and defend democracy, through a prism of race, gender, justice, and equity.

$169k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$169k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Health$268kCommunity Improvement$75kCrime & Legal$50kArts & Culture$43kInternational$25kPublic Benefit$9kPhilanthropy$8k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$168,517
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY$168,517
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROSE CITY JUSTICE INC: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Progressive Institute

The Northwest Progressive Institute is a social welfare organization working to raise everyone's equality of life through insightful research and imaginative advocacy. NPI's projects and publications promote policy development based on…

Civil Rights
2
Our Oregon

Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena

Human Services
3
North Star Action Center

This Organization exists to support and develop independent research and analysis to educate and assist elected leaders in making public interest decisions with a focus on advancing a free and open democracy, verdant environment, and a…

Community Improvement
4
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
5
Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility

Guided by the values and expertise of health care and public health, Oregon PSR works to protect human life from the gravest threats to health & survival

Environment
6
The Urbanist Fund

Support Public Interest Journalism in Washington State

Public Benefit
7
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation

The Pro-Choice Washington Foundation is our 501c3 focused on issue research, leadership development, and community and decision-maker education.

Civil Rights
8
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
9
Yes for Portland Clean Energy Fund

Support ballot measure

—
10
Fuse Innovation Fund

To develop creative programs to educate and engage activists about critical issues in Washington State

Environment
11
Cultural Advocacy Coalition Foundation

To raise funds which will be used to increase ongoing public investment in cultural, history, heritage and humanities. By amplifying artists work, publicizing creativity around the State of Oregon, advocating for equal access to funding…

Arts & Culture
12
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Recovers; the most unlike its peers is North Star Collaborative Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY: $168,517 · OtherOREGON HEALTH AUTHORITYIndividual grant recipient: $31,575 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT INC: $25,000 · OtherCITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT INCOREGON RECOVERS: $74,700 · HealthOREGON RECOVERSNorth Star Collaborative Foundation: $50,000 · PhilanthropyNorth Star Collab…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWM…RENTON REGIONAL COMMUNITY FNDN: $7,500 · PhilanthropyRENTON REGIONAL C…ROSE CITY JUSTICE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesROSE CITY J…NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $25,000 · EnvironmentOPEN HEARTS OPEN MINDS: $11,000 · Crime & LegalFRIENDS OF THE FORUM: $10,000 · InternationalIMPACT DATA & EVENTS INC: $8,507 · Civil Rights
Other$225,092Health$74,700Philanthropy$72,500Human Services$50,000Environment$25,000Crime & Legal$11,000International$10,000Civil Rights$8,507

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOREGON RECOVERS: $74,700 over 1y, 14% of budgetNorth Star Collaborative Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HEARTS OPEN MINDS: $11,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FORUM: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRENTON REGIONAL COMMUNITY FNDN: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Western States Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Western States Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Oregon Recovers: 6% of income from government
  • Open Hearts Open Minds: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Western States Center Inc?

Find your warmest path to Western States Center Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Western States Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph