Skip to content

· Private foundation

West End Health Foundation

To provide funding for health and wellness solutions in western Marquette County.

$373k
Granted FY2024still arriving
47
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$591kEducation$476kRecreation & Sports$330kHuman Services$144kYouth Development$77kFood & Nutrition$69kPhilanthropy$33kHousing & Shelter$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k31 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$2,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Great Lakes Recovery Center$60,000
Greater Ishpeming Commission of Aging$25,410
Republic Michigamme Schools$25,000
NICE Community Schools$25,000
Negaunee Public Schools$25,000
Ishpeming Public Schools$25,000
Marquette County Health Department$18,673
UP Children's Therapy$16,500
Partridge Creek Farm$12,750
Lakeview School Garden$11,840
Superior Child Advocacy Center$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Start the Cycle$10,000
Courage Inc$10,000
Ishpeming Cancer Society$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Little Brothers Friends of the Elderly: $2k → 14%UPDON: $25k → 11%UPDON: $20k → 11%UPDON: $10k → 11%Trillium House: $5k → 11%Trillium House: $500 → 11%Greater Ishpeming Commission of Aging: $25k → 11%Greater Ishpeming Commission of Aging: $10k → 11%Greater Ishpeming Commission of Aging: $9k → 11%Greater Ishpeming Commission of Aging: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 47 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
31

Total granted

$1.6M
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+56%

Still filing today

34%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GREAT LAKES RECOVERY CENTERS INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $167k · revenue +69%
  • US
    UPCAP SERVICES INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $66k · revenue +69%
  • SH
    SUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • SC
    Superior Connections Recovery Comm Org
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • BC
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +349%
  • IS
    Ishpming Ski ClubTraining Facility
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
2
Upper Peninsula Health Care Solutions Inc

To create opportunities of viability for health care providers in the upper peninsula of michigan and to improve access to quality health services for residents within their communities.

Health
3
Medical Care Access Coalition Inc

To promote cooperative medical services throughout marquette county and the upper peninsula of michigan that would provide a continuum of care for qualifying, uninsured, and/or under-insured persons.

—
4
Pace North

A provider of the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) which is a community-based, long-term care delivery program that provides comprehensive, coordinated, managed care to eligible participants.

Health
5
Midland County Cancer Society Dba Cancer Services

To provide personal and compassionate support to cancer patients and their caregivers in our community.

—
6
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
7
Top of Michigan Trails Council

We advocate and facilitate the development of a network of multipurpose recreational trails in Northern Lower Michigan.

Recreation & Sports
8
Innovation Marquette Enterprise Corporation

Non-profit business accelerator, providing support support and services to innovators, inventors, researchers and entrepreneurs.

Community Improvement
9
Invest Up

To enhance the vitality of the communities affected by the michigan's upper peninsula by leveraging local resources with capital and expertise and fostering economic opportunity throughout the area.

Community Improvement
10
Harm Reduction Michigan

The mission of harm reduction is to reduce substance abuse and related activities in a respectful manner in collaboration with the user

Health
11
Marinette County Committee on Aging Inc

Our mission at Marinette County Elderly Services is to assist older persons in maintaining a longer, healthier, and more fulfilled life.

Human Services
12
ShareCare of Leelanau Inc

To facilitate connecting the Leelanau county community of seniors with services and activities that promote a healthy independent and fulfilled lifestyle while aging.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Superior Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Start the Cycle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
26/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Negaunee Public Schools: $148,100 · OtherNegaunee Public SchoolsNICE Community Schools: $137,812 · OtherNICE Community SchoolsNORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $119,351 · OtherNORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYCOUNTY OF MARQUETTE: $100,975 · OtherCOUNTY OF MARQUETTEIshpeming Public Schools: $90,250 · OtherIshpeming Public SchoolsRepublic Michigamme Schools: $75,000 · OtherRepublic Michigamme SchoolsISHPEMING PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT: $65,000 · OtherRepublic Michigamme Schools: $51,500 · OtherUP CHILDRENS THERAPY: $45,720 · OtherTHE ISHPEMING CANCER SOCIETY SERVING MARQUETTE CO: $45,251 · Other+68 more: $447,117 · Other+68 moreGREAT LAKES RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $166,579 · HealthGREAT LAKES RECO…SUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $56,750 · HealthSUPERIOR HEALTH …Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation: $15,000 · HealthBlue Cross Blue …My Community Dental Centers Inc: $10,000 · Health+4 more: $12,300 · HealthUPCAP SERVICES INC: $65,749 · Human ServicesGREATER ISHPEMING COMMISSION ON AGING: $46,806 · Human ServicesTRILLIUM HOUSE INC: $5,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesSTART THE CYCLE: $68,532 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentPARTRIDGE CREEK FARM INC: $28,450 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $6,400 · Food & NutritionCEDAR TREE: $6,000 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE COUNTY: $5,138 · Philanthropy
Other$1,326,076Health$260,629Human Services$119,555Youth Development$70,032Food & Nutrition$34,850Crime & Legal$6,000Philanthropy$5,138

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREAT LAKES RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $166,579 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUPCAP SERVICES INC: $65,749 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $56,750 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER ISHPEMING COMMISSION ON AGING: $46,806 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetTHE ISHPEMING CANCER SOCIETY SERVING MARQUETTE CO: $45,251 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetPARTRIDGE CREEK FARM INC: $28,450 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC MARQUETTE COUNTY: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $16,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBlue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $13,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER INC: $11,949 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMy Community Dental Centers Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $9,050 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCOPPER SHORES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $6,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $6,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDAR TREE: $6,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetTRILLIUM HOUSE INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE COUNTY: $5,138 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIX FEET OVER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROOM AT THE INN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPREGNANCY SERVICES OF MARQUETTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARQUETTE COUNTY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget906 ADVENTURE TEAM: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY UPPER MICHIGAN CHAPTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUPERIOR STRING ALLIANCE INC: $1,200 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetIRON RANGE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetORE TO SHORE: $775 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRICHMOND TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUP PINK POWER INC: $450 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetADULT LEARNING SYSTEMS UP INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREAT LAKES RECOVERY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds START THE CYCLE ↗
  • Who funds UPCAP SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ISHPEMING COMMISSION ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds THE ISHPEMING CANCER SOCIETY SERVING MARQUETTE CO ↗
  • Who funds PARTRIDGE CREEK FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC MARQUETTE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds My Community Dental Centers Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Superior Health FoundationMI45.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Superior Health Foundation · Community Foundation of Marquette County · Phyllis & Max Reynolds Foundation · United Way of Marquette County · The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation · Flagstar Foundation Inc · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Tourville Foundation · Frazier Fund Inc · Ray & Peg Hirvonen Charitable Foundation · Me Davenport Fund a Private Foundation Inc · L G Kaufman Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization West End Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from West End Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to West End Health Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to West End Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on West End Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph