Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wesley Luehring Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$350k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$755kCrime & Legal$505kRecreation & Sports$405kReligion$340kArts & Culture$255kCivil Rights$205kHealth$130kEducation$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA OF DUPAGE COUNTY$55,000
WHEATON PARK DISTRICT$50,000
ELK GROVE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$35,000
PEOPLES RESOURCE CENTER$30,000
ST JOSEPH'S LITTLE SISTERS$25,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$25,000
LITTLE FRIENDS$20,000
BRIDGE COMMUNITIES$20,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE - CDH$20,000
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS$15,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$15,000
THE HADLEY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND$10,000
DOODLEBUG WORKSHOP$10,000
BOHEMIAN LAWYERS ASSOCIATION$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $235k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $20k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $20k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $20k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $20k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $20k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $15k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $15k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $15k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $15k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $15k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 19 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
1

Total granted

$2.7M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
-6%

Still filing today

37%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CASA OF DUPAGE COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $415k · revenue +71%
  • PR
    PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +70%
  • LF
    LITTLE FRIENDS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • FT
    FEED THE CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Link Inc

Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…

Human Services
2
Friends of the Children - Chicago

Friends of the children - chicago has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Human Services
3
Children's Home & Aid Society of Ill

Founded in 1883, brightpoint (formerly known as children's home & aid) is a leading statewide organization supporting families so children can thrive.

Human Services
4
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
5
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
6
The Arc of Illinois

The Arc of Illinois is committed to empowering persons with disabilities to achieve full participation in community life through informed choices.

—
7
Oak Leyden Developmental Services Inc

To help people with developmental disabilities meet life's challenges and reach their highest potential.

—
8
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
9
Rimland Services Nfp

Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.

Human Services
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Cook County

CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.

Crime & Legal
11
Christian Social Services of Illinois

Caritas family solutions strengthens the social and emotional well-being of individuals and families in order to create healthy relationships, loving homes and strong communities.

Human Services
12
Little City Foundation

To ensure that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are provided with the best options and opportunities to live safely, work productively, explore creatively, learn continuously and play pleasurably throughout their…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Friends Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHEATON PARK DISTRICT: $405,000 · OtherWHEATON PARK DISTRICTST JOSEPH'S LITTLE SISTERS: $240,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S LITTLE SISTERSPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $205,000 · OtherPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTERELK GROVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $190,000 · OtherELK GROVE HISTORICAL SOCIETYRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE - CDH: $160,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE - CDHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOR UNWED MOTHERS: $135,000 · OtherBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOR UNWED MOTHERSMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $125,000 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLSTHE SALVATION ARMY: $100,000 · OtherMS SOCIETY: $90,000 · OtherBOHEMIAN LAWYERS ASSOCIATION: $90,000 · OtherELK GROVE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $65,000 · Other+3 more: $115,000 · Other+3 moreCASA OF DUPAGE COUNTY INC: $415,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF DUPAGE CO…LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $135,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE FR…OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $100,000 · Human ServicesOUTREACH …HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $90,000 · EducationGiant Steps Illinois Inc: $15,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $25,000 · HealthBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $10,000 · International
Other$1,920,000Civil Rights$415,000Human Services$235,000Education$115,000Health$25,000Housing & Shelter$20,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA OF DUPAGE COUNTY INC: $415,000 over 8y, 8.6% of budgetPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $205,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $135,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $100,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $90,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetKids Above All Illinois: $55,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetConnection of Friends: $45,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGiant Steps Illinois Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA OF DUPAGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds Kids Above All Illinois ↗
  • Who funds Connection of Friends ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Giant Steps Illinois Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community FoundationIL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · The Chicago Community Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wesley Luehring Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wesley Luehring Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wesley Luehring’s filings →

More from the funding graph