· Private foundation
Werling-Alles Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WARM CENTER | $5,000 |
| SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| HENDERSON SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| FATHER BRADLEY SHELTER | $5,000 |
| ST VINCENT DEPAUL FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| TUNNEL OF TOWERS | $3,500 |
| UNITED CARING SHELTER | $3,000 |
| RED BIRD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| AURORA | $2,000 |
| TOUCH | $1,500 |
| IU FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| FRIENDS OF AUDUBON | $1,000 |
| EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION | $1,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIER PROJECT | $500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- HSHENDERSON SALVATION ARMY4× · 2020–2024 · $17k
- SVST VINCENT DEPAUL FOOD BANK4× · 2020–2024 · $17k
- SOSISTERS OF ST BENEDICT4× · 2020–2024 · $16k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $2k
- GGoodfellowsone grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
UVHS improves quality of life for people and pets through an innovative animal shelter and adoption center and through services that reduce suffering, support wellness, and foster compassion.
Care for the terminally ill
Auburn valley humane society enriches the lives of companion animals and people through animal sheltering, programs, services and community engagement
To provide, through the power of jesus christ, a home for the homeless, food for the hungry, and hope for their future.
Sheltered home environment
Strategies to End Homelessness leads a coordinated community effort to end homelessness in Greater Cincinnati.
Providing safe shelter through collaborative care.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity evansville adheres to…
Arbor acres, an affiliate ministry of the united methodist church, serves senior adults through facilities and programs that enhance opportunity for security, contentment and life with meaning and purpose.
To work towards the prevention and elimination of domestic and dating violence.
Provide shelter for homeless animals and prevent animal cruelty
To be a safe haven and human voice for all animals in need.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United Caring Shelters Inc ↗
- Who funds TOUCH INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF AUDUBON INC ↗
- Who funds AURORA INC ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds VANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Koch Foundation Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · West Side Nut Club Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Werling-Alles Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Werling-Alles Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Werling-Alles’ filings →