Skip to content
Wellness Vision Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Wellness Vision Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$166kArts & Culture$127kHealth$126kFood & Nutrition$55kPhilanthropy$35kPublic Benefit$25kInternational$23kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$821k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLINTON FOUNDATION$25,000
ARKANSAS CINEMA SOCIETY$15,000
YOUTH HOME INC$15,000
ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL$5,000
ARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$2,500
WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS$2,500
ARKANSAS SINGLE PARENT SCHOLARSHIP$1,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LOTUS OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 10%UNICEF: $2k → 17%AR SHERIFF YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 15%CLINTON FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%UNHCR - USA UNITED NATIONS HIGH COM: $5k → 14%SHARED INTEREST: $10k → 17%ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE: $11k → 17%UNHCR - USA UNITED NATIONS HIGH COM: $5k → 14%ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE: $10k → 17%ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE: $10k → 17%ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE: $7k → 17%ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE: $6k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS: $5k → 17%ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE: $5k → 17%ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE: $4k → 17%ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE: $4k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS: $3k → 17%ARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE: $2k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS: $1k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS: $1k → 17%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $53k → 17%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $32k → 17%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $25k → 17%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $25k → 17%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $13k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF: $10k → 17%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $7k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF: $5k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF: $5k → 17%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $5k → 17%ARKANSAS WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME: $2k → 17%ARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $10k → 17%ARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $3k → 17%ARKANSAS SINGLE PARENT SCHOLARSHIP: $3k → 17%ARKANSAS SINGLE PARENT SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 17%MI18 RECOVERY: $1k → 17%GREATER CHRIST TEMPLE: $2k → 17%GREATER CHRIST TEMPLE: $2k → 17%GREATER CHRIST TEMPLE: $1k → 17%GREATER CHRIST TEMPLE: $800 → 17%YOUTH HOME INC: $20k → 17%YOUTH HOME INC: $20k → 17%YOUTH HOME INC: $15k → 17%YOUTH HOME INC: $15k → 17%YOUTH HOME INC: $15k → 17%YOUTH HOME INC: $15k → 17%YOUTH HOME INC: $15k → 17%YOUTH HOME INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$540k · 11 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +100% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$540k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
-9%

Still filing today

45%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureInternationalCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YH
    YOUTH HOME INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +34%
  • AC
    ARKANSAS CINEMA SOCIETY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $113k · revenue +151%
  • AH
    ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • SI
    SHARED INTEREST INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -31%
  • AS
    AR SHERIFF YOUTH RANCH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • AR
    ARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Nonprofit News Network

Producing journalism that matters to Arkansans.

Arts & Culture
2
Arkansans for Education Reform Foundation
Education
3
Arkansas Black Hall of Fame Foundat

Provide african american awareness on arkansans who have made important contributions to society

Arts & Culture
4
New Generation Inc

Usher in leadership & policies that make arkansas the best place to live, work, and raise a family.

Community Improvement
5
Arkansas Bankers Association Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families

Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…

Human Services
7
Arkansas Appleseed Legal Justice Center

Arkansas Appleseed Justice Center is an advocacy organization launched in September 2021 to advance inclusive, collective, and systemic solutions to issues of equity, poverty, and justice facing Arkansans.

Civil Rights
8
Arkansas Humanities Council

The purpose of the arkansas humanities council is to promote understanding, appreciation, and use of the humanities in arkansas. to achieve its purpose, the council awards grants through a competitive application process to nonprofit…

—
9
Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Provide help to domestic violence victims and encourage community efforts to promote domestic peace.

—
10
Arkansas Education Association

Advocate for educational professionals and unite our members and the state to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

Education
11
Arkansas Foundation for the Blind and Visually Impaired

The foundation's mission is to broaden and enhance educational and employment opportunities for persons with visual impairments.

Education
12
Arkansas Cash for Kindness

To provide assistance to those in need living in the community.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arkansas Values Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lotus Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $160,300 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRALIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $12,500 · OtherARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTSUNHCR - USA UNITED NATIONS HIGH COM: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $15,700 · Other+4 moreYOUTH HOME INC: $125,000 · HealthYOUTH HOME INCBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINT…ARKANSAS CINEMA SOCIETY INC: $112,500 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS CINEMA SOCIET…+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $55,250 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS H…ARKANSAS VALUES INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsSHARED INTEREST INC: $10,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,000 · InternationalWOMENS FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS: $9,500 · Community ImprovementARKANSAS WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME: $2,000 · Community ImprovementLOTUS OUTREACH: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$218,500Health$150,000Arts & Culture$114,500Food & Nutrition$55,250Civil Rights$25,000International$12,000Community Improvement$11,500Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH HOME INC: $125,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetARKANSAS CINEMA SOCIETY INC: $112,500 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $55,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARKANSAS VALUES INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetSHARED INTEREST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWOMENS FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS: $9,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOTUS OUTREACH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CINEMA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS VALUES INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARED INTEREST INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds LOTUS OUTREACH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Fo…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wellness Vision Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wellness Vision Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wellness Vision’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home