· Private foundation
Wellness Foundation AKA The Reshmi & Mahmood Siddique Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AL-SHIFA FOUNDATION OF NORTH AMERICA | $42,000 |
| AL-SHIFA FOUNDATION OF NORTH AMERICA | $21,660 |
| AL-SHIFA FOUNDATION OF NORTH AMERICA | $21,660 |
| AL-SHIFA FOUNDATION OF NORTH AMERICA | $21,556 |
| RAHBAR FOUNDATION TRUST | $20,388 |
| PRINCETON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $14,278 |
| AL-SHIFA FOUNDATION OF NORTH AMERICA | $13,894 |
| PUERTO RICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| PRINCETON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 27% of Wellness Foundation AKA The Reshmi & Mahmood Siddique Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAL-SHIFA FOUNDATION OF NORTH AMERICA2× · 2023–2024 · $207k · revenue +27%
- MUMidwestern University2× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +11%
WOMANSPACE INC4× · 2017–2020 · $27k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- NJNEW JERSEY COALITION TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +129%
HENRY J AUSTIN HEALTH CENTER INCone grant, 2019 · $19k · revenue +24%- FGFAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -91%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
Metropolitan family health network, inc operates a healthcare center in jersey city, new jersey to provide a broad range of health services to a largely underserved population.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…
Muhlenberg regional medical center is committed to excellence in
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The mission of the new jersey primary care association is to plan, promote and facilitate equal access to quality health care for individuals and families through organized primary care centers and center networks that seek to maintain…
Ahsfhc is a federally qualified health center. ahsfhc's mission is to provide quality and compassionate health care services to the asian american community and all other underserved or underprivileged communities in a culturally competent…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muslim Advocates and the most unlike its peers is Rahbar Foundation Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AL-SHIFA FOUNDATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds Midwestern University ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY COALITION TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds WOMANSPACE INC ↗
- Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
- Who funds RAHBAR FOUNDATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds HENRY J AUSTIN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds American Muslim Health Professionals ↗
- Who funds FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PUERTO RICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE YWCA PRINCETON INC ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM ADVOCATES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · The Burke Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wellness Foundation AKA The Reshmi & Mahmood Siddique Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Womanspace Inc — 47% of income from government
- Henry J Austin Health Center Inc — 34% of income from government
- Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
- Puerto Rican Community Center Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.