Skip to content

Maryland · Public charity

Wellness Advocacy Fund

Promotion of social welfare to other 501(c)(3) and (c)(4) organizations.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
29
Grants FY2025
28
Organizations funded FY2024
36%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$200,000
Organizations funded a year
11 to 28
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
11
Total assets, FY2025
$17M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 36% of the organizations Wellness Advocacy Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 39% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving23$2.5M13%
FY202428$4.4M36%
FY202317$1.9M0%
FY202222$3.6M68%
FY202111$1.4M91%
FY202016$1.9Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$10MCivil Rights$3.9MEnvironment$1.4MEducation$275kCommunity Improvement$250kPhilanthropy$150kHuman Services$75k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
PA
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Way to Win Action Fund Inc$1,500,00063%
America Votes$1,125,00041%
Center for Voter Information$1,000,00046%
Tides Advocacy$900,00040%
Alliance for Youth Action$800,00058%
Indivisible Project$750,00052%
Forward Action Fund$600,00032%
Somos PAC$500,0001n/a
Living United for Change in Arizona$450,00045%
End Citizens United Let America Vote Action Fund$450,000414%
Show all 54 grantees
All grantees of Wellness Advocacy Fund by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Way to Win Action Fund Inc$1,500,00063%
America Votes$1,125,00041%
Center for Voter Information$1,000,00046%
Tides Advocacy$900,00040%
Alliance for Youth Action$800,00058%
Indivisible Project$750,00052%
Forward Action Fund$600,00032%
Somos PAC$500,0001n/a
Living United for Change in Arizona$450,00045%
End Citizens United Let America Vote Action Fund$450,000414%
Future Now Action$450,00036%
The PAC for America's Future$450,0002n/a
Casa in Action Inc$400,00044%
Make the Road Action Inc$400,00042%
Way to Lead PAC$400,0002n/a
Majority Forward$400,0001n/a
Rural Arizona Action$350,00026%
Voces de la Frontera Action Inc$350,00035%
Asian American Advocacy Fund Inc$300,00054%
We the People MI$250,00033%
Stand Up America Inc$250,000210%
Indian American Impact$250,000210%
League of Conservation Voters Inc$225,00030%
Reset Tech Action$200,00021%
Black Voters Matter Fund Inc$200,00014%
Fair Fight Action Inc$200,00031%
Chispa Az PAC$200,0002n/a
Leaders We Deserve$200,0001n/a
Black Male Voter Project$200,00016%
Center for Empowered Politics Education Fund$175,00031%
Climate Equity Action Fund$150,0001n/a
Casa in Action PAC Inc$150,0002n/a
Rise Action Fund$150,00022%
Alaska Progressive Donor Table$150,000211%
Swing Left$100,0001n/a
Priorities USA$100,00010%
Mi Familia Vota$100,00012%
Fair Fight Action$100,0001n/a
Protect Democracy United$100,00016%
House Majority Forward$100,00010%
Legislative Majority PAC$100,0001n/a
We the People Michigan PAC$75,0002n/a
Momsrising Together$75,00011%
We The People Action Fund$50,0001n/a
Rup Inc$50,00014%
National Redistricting Action Fund$50,00010%
Center for Empowered Politics$50,0001n/a
Indigenous Vote$50,00015%
New Georgia Project Inc$50,00010%
Pennsylvania Stands Up Inc$50,00011%
Florida Rising Inc$50,00011%
Pontiac Policy Action Fund$25,0001n/a
Progress Michigan Inc$25,00010%
Common Power$25,00011%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Wellness Advocacy Fund supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWay to Win Action Fund Inc: $1,500,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetAmerica Votes: $1,125,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCenter for Voter Information: $1,000,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetTides Advocacy: $900,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAlliance for Youth Action: $800,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetIndivisible Project: $750,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetForward Action Fund: $600,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetLiving United for Change in Arizona: $450,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetEnd Citizens United Let America Vote Action Fund: $450,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetFuture Now Action: $450,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetCasa in Action Inc: $400,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetMake the Road Action Inc: $400,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetRural Arizona Action: $350,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetVoces de la Frontera Action Inc: $350,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetAsian American Advocacy Fund Inc: $300,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetWe the People MI: $250,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetStand Up America Inc: $250,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetIndian American Impact: $250,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetLeague of Conservation Voters Inc: $225,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetReset Tech Action: $200,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBlack Voters Matter Fund Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetFair Fight Action Inc: $200,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBlack Male Voter Project: $200,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetCenter for Empowered Politics Education Fund: $175,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetRise Action Fund: $150,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetAlaska Progressive Donor Table: $150,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetPriorities USA: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMi Familia Vota: $100,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetProtect Democracy United: $100,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetHouse Majority Forward: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMomsrising Together: $75,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRup Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetNational Redistricting Action Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIndigenous Vote: $50,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetNew Georgia Project Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPennsylvania Stands Up Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFlorida Rising Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetProgress Michigan Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCommon Power: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 39.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundDC59.5× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · America Votes · Tides Advocacy · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Women Donors Network Action · Tides Foundation · Our American Future Action · Pro-Democracy Campaign · Future Forward USA Action

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Wellness Advocacy Fund with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wellness Advocacy Fund?

Find your warmest path to Wellness Advocacy Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Wellness Advocacy Fund

How much does Wellness Advocacy Fund give?
Wellness Advocacy Fund reported 29 grants totaling $3,225,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 28 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Wellness Advocacy Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (63%), Civil Rights (24%), Environment (8%).
Who are Wellness Advocacy Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Way to Win Action Fund Inc ($1.5M), America Votes ($1.1M), Center for Voter Information ($1.0M).
Does Wellness Advocacy Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 36% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Wellness Advocacy Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Sixteen Thirty Fund, America Votes, Tides Advocacy.
Where is Wellness Advocacy Fund based?
Wellness Advocacy Fund is based in MD.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wellness Advocacy’s filings →

More from the funding graph