Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weiss Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$437k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Animals$738kEnvironment$440kArts & Culture$52kEducation$47kRecreation & Sports$2kCommunity Improvement$500
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $400k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AKASHINGA INC$200,000
MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC$200,000
BURNING MAN PROJECT$25,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC$10,000
THE UNITED STATES PONY CLUBS INC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%INTERNATIONAL ANTI-POACHING FOUNDATION INC: $200k → 22%BOLINAS-STINSON BEACH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $250k → 10%WILDLIFE GUARDIANS: $100k → 14%MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $200k → 5%AKASHINGA INC: $200k → 22%BOLINAS-STINSON BEACH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $18k → 8%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $100k → 10%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $40k → 14%SIDEKICK FOUNDATION INC: $78k → 5%BOLINAS-STINSON BEACH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $10k → 10%THE UNITED STATES PONY CLUBS INC: $2k → 8%BURNING MAN PROJECT: $25k → 10%BOLINAS FILM FESTIVAL INC: $2k → 8%BURNING MAN PROJECT: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 5 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+56%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AKASHINGA INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $400k · revenue -21%
  • WC
    WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $360k · revenue +87%
  • ME
    MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $278k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • WG
    WILDLIFE GUARDIANSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +56%
  • FF
    FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +455%
  • BF
    Bolinas Film Festival Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wildlife Protection Solutions

To protect endangered species.

Animals
2
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment
3
Bay Nature Institute dba Bay Nature Bay Nature Magazine

Bay Nature connects the people of the San Francisco Bay Area to our natural world and motivates people to solve problems with nature in mind. Our vision is that all people have a close relationship with theirnatural world.

Environment
4
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
5
Reel Earth Films

Reel Earth Films promotes wildlife conservation by creating films that nurture the human connection to nature, spread awareness about life-threatening challenges facing species worldwide, and advance environmental activism and research.

Arts & Culture
6
Oikonos - Ecosystem Knowledge

Oikonos studies and protects imperiled ecosystems by engaging diverse communities through innovative scientific and artistic collaborations.

Science & Tech
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Fund for Wild Nature

The Fund for Wild Nature's mission is to raise funds and provide small grants to promote the conservation and protection of the Earth's wildlands, roadless and wilderness areas, wildlife and natural ecosystems.

Environment
9
Wildlife Media

Wildlife Media is committed to advancing conservation and achieving measurable impact on the worlds most inspiring conservation issues.

Animals
10
Blue Forest Finance Inc

Blue forest is a non-profit conservation finance organization. we bring people, finance and science together to restore and protect our forests, watersheds, ecosystems and communities.

Environment
11
Wildlife Conservation Global Inc

Wildlife conservation global, inc. operates the okapi conservation project (ocp) which works in the democratic republic of the congo with the institute in congo for the conservation of nature (iccn) and local communities throughout the…

Animals
12
Wildlife Sos

Protecting india's precious wildlife from poaching, habitat loss, and human exploitation since 1995.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rotary Club of Menlo Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AKASHINGA INC: $400,000 · AnimalsAKASHINGA INCWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $360,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INCWILDLIFE GUARDIANS: $100,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE GUARDIANSMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $277,500 · PhilanthropyMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA IN…FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyFAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL …BURNING MAN PROJECT: $50,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $500 · Community ImprovementBOLINAS-STINSON BEACH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $47,000 · Crime & LegalTHE UNITED STATES PONY CLUBS INC: $1,500 · OtherBolinas Film Festival Inc: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Animals$860,000Philanthropy$317,500Community Improvement$50,500Crime & Legal$47,000Other$1,500Arts & Culture$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAKASHINGA INC: $400,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $360,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $277,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetWILDLIFE GUARDIANS: $100,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetBURNING MAN PROJECT: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOLINAS-STINSON BEACH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $47,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetFAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF MENLO PARK FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weiss Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weiss Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weiss Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Weiss Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weiss Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph