Skip to content
Weishoff Sisters Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Weishoff Sisters Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$59kYouth Development$48kCivil Rights$42kCrime & Legal$30kHealth$19kFood & Nutrition$15kEnvironment$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$668k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES$12,500
ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$12,500
WE CARE SOLAR$10,000
WOMENS BEAN PROJECT$5,000
REALIZE IMPACT$5,000
BRIDGE PROJECTS INC$5,000
FRONTLINE WOMENS FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SAFE HORIZONS: $15k → 17%INTER FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $3k → 8%SENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 12%REALIZE IMPACT: $5k → 10%SAFE HORIZON: $10k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$164k · 7 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$164k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
0%

Still filing today

86%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalCivil RightsHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +170%
  • SH
    SAFE HORIZON INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +4%
  • YF
    Yellowhammer Fund
    2× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PEACE OF MIND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +50%
  • TE
    TEXAS EQUAL ACCESS FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
2
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
3
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
4
Center for International Policy Inc

The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…

International
5
World Privacy Forum

The world privacy forum is dedicated to reimaging privacy in a digital era through ground-breaking, in-depth privacy research and consumer education of the highest quality. our vision is to empower people with the knowledge, rights, and…

Public Benefit
6
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
9
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
10
Earthenable Inc

Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…

International
11
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
12
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yellowhammer Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS: $22,500 · OtherISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDSIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE GROWHAUS: $12,500 · OtherTHE GROWHAUSTEXAS EQUAL ACCESS FUND: $10,000 · OtherTEXAS EQUAL ACCESS FUNDTOGETHER AND UNITED FOR PUERTO RICO: $7,000 · OtherTOGETHER AND UNITED FOR PUERTO RICOTHE GATHERING PLACE: $6,000 · OtherTHE GATHERING PLACECITY YEAR INC: $6,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INCISRAEL ENDOWMNET FUNDS: $5,000 · OtherFRONTLINE WOMENS FUND: $5,000 · OtherWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $5,000 · OtherGIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES: $47,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN O…SAFE HORIZON INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HORIZON IN…Realize Impact: $5,000 · Human ServicesRealize ImpactSENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSENIORS' RESOUR…INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $2,500 · Human ServicesINTER-FAITH FOO…Yellowhammer Fund: $25,000 · Civil RightsYellowhammer…NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $7,500 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PEACE OF MIND INC: $15,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…Save The Children Federation Inc: $10,000 · InternationalSave The Ch…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $19,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…WE CARE SOLAR: $10,000 · HealthWE CARE SOL…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BRIDGE PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$101,000Youth Development$47,500Human Services$40,000Civil Rights$32,500International$30,000Health$29,000Philanthropy$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES: $47,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYellowhammer Fund: $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PEACE OF MIND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GROWHAUS: $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Xcel Energy FoundationMN13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weishoff Sisters Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weishoff Sisters Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Weishoff Sisters Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Weishoff Sisters Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weishoff Sisters’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home