· Private foundation
Weisenburger Family Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of WEISENBURGER FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $95k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH | $48,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $19,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,500 |
| NORTHWEST OHIO CLASSICAL ACADEMY | $8,700 |
| ST FRANCIS DE SALES HIGH SCHOOL | $8,500 |
| ST ROSE CATHOLIC CHURCH | $8,000 |
| OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP CATHOLIC | $5,000 |
| HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO | $5,000 |
| MERCIDARIAN SISTERS OF THE BLESSED | $5,000 |
| DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY | $5,000 |
| ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM | $4,000 |
| HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY | $4,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE CATHOLIC SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +0%
- NONorthwest Ohio Classical Academy5× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +93%
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- MOMONASTERY OF THE VISITATIONone grant, 2021 · $25k
- SISERRA INTERNATIONALone grant, 2021 · $5k
- SJST JOHN DOMINIC RASMUSSENone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Catholics for Choice - which serves the pro-choice Catholic majority - encounters, educates, and emboldens people of faith who support reproductive freedom. Catholics for Choice believes healthcare is a human right and that includes access…
Life Network provides support and mentoring to women and men facing unexpected pregnancies; offers parenting support, material resources, and referrals; and promotes sexual risk avoidance through education to foster a culture that values…
To educate the public about abortion
Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.
The catholic education foundation is dedicated to the growth and vitality of catholic education in the archdiocese of louisville. the foundation advances its mission primarily through tuition assistance grants to families who cannot afford…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Organized for religious purposes to promote the gospel of jesus christ by protecting, defending and advocating religious civil liberties
Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.
Ncr connects catholics to church, faith and the common good with independent news, analysis and spiritual reflection.
To inform, instruct and inspire people through the media about the sacred scriptures and teachings of the roman catholic church
To support pro-life organizations.
To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Christian Virtue and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC ↗
- Who funds Northwest Ohio Classical Academy ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATH LEAGUE FOR RELIGIOUS & CIVIL RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds OHIO RIGHT TO LIFE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR A CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds ANNE GRADY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CATHOLIC HGR ED ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE ↗
- Who funds PRIESTS FOR LIFE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The LaValley Foundation · Fifth Station Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · Gregory M& Deborah Mdesaye Foundation Inc · Cousineau Family Charity · Rafael Madan & Lilian Casas Foundation · The Moran Foundation · Vandevere Charitable Foundation · John a & Mary Pollock Yanta Memorial Tr · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · Hylant Family Foundation Inc · The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Weisenburger Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Weisenburger Family Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Weisenburger Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.