Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Weinstein Foundation Inc

The organization is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and/or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish federation of greater atlanta, inc., an irc section 501(c)(3) organization.

$266k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$105k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of Weinstein Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Greater Atlanta Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
17
7
18
7
19
6
20
7
21
12
22
9
23
8
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$829kHuman Services$564kHealth$275kInternational$190kEducation$90kCommunity Improvement$20kArts & Culture$10kReligion$10k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $245,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $266,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $21,100 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC$105,000
JEWISH HOME LIFE COMMUNITIES$35,000
WEINSTEIN HOSPICE$25,000
THE BLUE DOVE FOUNDATION$10,000
WELLSPRING LIVING INC$10,000
AGAHOZO SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES$10,000
REPAIR THE WORLD$10,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$10,000
IMPACTISRAEL$10,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SER FAMILIA: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $39k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $35k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $35k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $30k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $20k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $10k → 14%CHRIS 180 INC: $10k → 14%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $25k → 13%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $25k → 13%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $25k → 13%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $25k → 13%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $25k → 13%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $25k → 13%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$969k · 10 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$969k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-1%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    Jewish Home Life Communities Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $250k · revenue +11%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $189k · revenue +156%
  • TV
    The Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $175k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • BH
    BREAKTHRU HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -42%
  • TL
    The Link Counseling Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +43%
  • SF
    SER FAMILIAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +199%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

2
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
3
Jewish Nursing Home of Western Massachusetts Inc

To care for the frail, elderly and infirmed according to jewish traditions.

Human Services
4
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

Health
5
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

6
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

7
Jgs Administrative Services Inc

To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.

Health
8
Chelsea Jewish Green House Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals and families throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing and rehabilitation, and assisted living care without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to…

Health
9
Jha Geriatric Services Inc

Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.

Health
10
Chelsea Jewish Community Inc

The organization's mission is to provide the highest level of home health and hospice care services without regard of an individual's ability to pay.

Health
11
Chelsea Jewish Charitable Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in fundraising activities and provide support services to sponsor related non-profit entities which are engaged to enrich the life of each of their residents and program participants, so that each…

Health
12
The Jerusalem Connection

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Repair the World and the most unlike its peers is Blue Dove Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%5%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr14%33%20–35yr9%14%35–55yr13%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%1%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr14%16%20–35yr9%13%35–55yr13%49%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,279

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $749,200 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INCJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA — $40,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC — $188,750 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY & CAREE…The Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc — $175,000 · Human ServicesThe Vi and Milton Wei…+2 more — $20,000 · Human ServicesJewish Home Life Communities Inc — $249,750 · Housing & ShelterJewish Home Li…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $80,000 · InternationalAMERICAN J…IMPACTISRAEL INC — $60,000 · InternationalIMPACTISRA…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $40,000 · InternationalJEWISH NAT…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · InternationalADULT DAY OF DUNWOODY FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 · OtherBlue Dove Foundation Inc — $50,000 · OtherREPAIR THE WORLD — $20,000 · OtherWellspring Living Inc — $10,000 · OtherTHE WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HERITAGE MUSEUM INC — $10,000 · OtherThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc — $60,000 · HealthPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc — $20,000 · HealthBREAKTHRU HOUSE INC — $10,000 · HealthThe Link Counseling Center Inc — $10,000 · HealthAGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC — $90,000 · Education
Philanthropy$829,200Human Services$383,750Housing & Shelter$249,750International$190,000Other$145,000Health$100,000Education$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $749,200 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetJewish Home Life Communities Inc — $249,750 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC — $188,750 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc — $175,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetAGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC — $90,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc — $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBlue Dove Foundation Inc — $50,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREPAIR THE WORLD — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHRU HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Link Counseling Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSER FAMILIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIS 180 INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellspring Living Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILLIAM BREMAN JEWISH HERITAGE MUSEUM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weinstein Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph