Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weingerspector Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$210k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$156k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$491kPhilanthropy$320kHealth$39kHuman Services$28kCivil Rights$26kRecreation & Sports$13kInternational$6kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $156k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JCC CHICAGO$156,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND$25,000
AM SHALOM$5,000
IWMF$2,000
NATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION$2,000
GI RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
NATE WASSERMAN CAMP FUND$2,000
EZRA MULTI-SERVICE CENTER$2,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$1,250
MISERICORDIA$1,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$1,000
PAWS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY$1,000
FOUNDATION FOR FIGHTING BLINDNESS FUND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WARFIGHTER MADE: $1k → 11%TRI CON CHILD CARE CENTER: $500 → 8%JCC CHICAGO: $156k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $100k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $90k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $50k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $30k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $30k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$943k · 27 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
3

Total granted

$943k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-13%

Still filing today

52%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthCivil RightsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    Jewish Community Centers of Chicago
    6× · 2020–2025 · $456k · revenue +23%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $320k · revenue +13%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • JC
    JCC CHICAGO WOMEN'S BOARD
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • WM
    Warfighter Made
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -13%
  • A
    AIDA
    one grant, 2023 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
5
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
6
National Center for Jewish Filminc

The national center for jewish film is a unique, independent nonprofit motion picture archive, distributor, resource center and exhibitor. ncjf's ongoing mission is the collection, preservation and exhibition of films with artistic and…

Arts & Culture
7
Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas

As the voice of the jewish community, to protect jewish interests & promote jewish ideals.

—
8
Jewish Community Relations Council of Indianapolis

The Jewish Community Relations Council is the public affairs arm of the organized Jewish community, building consensus on issues of concern, and then communicating those interests to policy makers, faith and ethnic communities, civic…

—
9
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
10
Jewish Community Centers of Greater Boston

To advance the aspirations of families and individuals to enrich their lives, bodies and spirits, by providing the best in contemporary programs and experiences, informed by jewish values for today's jews and the people in their lives.

Human Services
11
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
12
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Child and Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Paws Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jewish Community Centers of Chicago: $455,981 · Human ServicesJewish Community Centers of Chicago+4 more: $19,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $320,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHI…+1 more: $1,500 · PhilanthropyAM SHALOM: $25,700 · OtherAM SHALOMNATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARKIN…MISERICORDIA: $9,250 · OtherMISERICORDIASUPPORT FOR SOLDIERS FREEDOM: $9,000 · OtherSUPPORT FOR SOL…NATE WASSERMAN CAMP FUND: $9,000 · OtherNATE WASSERMAN …EZRA: $8,500 · OtherEZRAEZRA MULTI-SERVICE CENTER: $8,000 · OtherEZRA MULTI-SERV…FRIENDS OF THE IDF CHICAGO: $7,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE …EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP CHANGE FOR CHARLEY: $6,000 · OtherIWMF: $5,879 · OtherGI RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherJCC CHICAGO WOMEN'S BOARD: $5,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $4,500 · Other+4 more: $6,350 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $9,500 · Civil RightsPAWS INC: $5,000 · AnimalsHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $2,000 · Arts & CultureASSOCIATION OF ISRAEL'S DECORATIVE ARTS: $750 · Arts & CultureNorthwestern University: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,000 · HealthLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,122 · Health
Human Services$475,481Philanthropy$321,500Other$127,179Civil Rights$9,500Animals$5,000Arts & Culture$4,750Recreation & Sports$4,000Health$3,122

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish Community Centers of Chicago: $455,981 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $320,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $9,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS INC: $5,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $4,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,122 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWarfighter Made: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION OF ISRAEL'S DECORATIVE ARTS: $750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTRI-CON CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jewish Community Centers of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Child and Family Services ↗
  • Who funds PAWS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds Michael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Warfighter Made ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF ISRAEL'S DECORATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds TRI-CON CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weingerspector Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weingerspector Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weingerspector’s filings →

More from the funding graph