Skip to content

· Private foundation

Weinberg Family Foundation (Formerly Michael F & Edith H Weinberg Char Fdtn)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$29kHealth$24kArts & Culture$5kEducation$4kHuman Services$3kInternational$2kPublic Benefit$2kHousing & Shelter$450Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLD WESTBURY HEBREW CONGREGATION$3,670
NORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAEL$2,000
STUDENT ADVOCACY$500
NC HILLEL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 41 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
32

Total granted

$62k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+22%

Still filing today

41%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +100%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +392%
  • SA
    STUDENT ADVOCACY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • NY
    NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
10
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
11
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
12
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OLD WESTBURY HEBREW CONGREGATION INC: $22,220 · OtherOLD WESTBURY HEBREW CONGREGATION INCNEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL: $5,000 · OtherNEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $4,500 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGENORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAEL: $4,000 · OtherNORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAELNORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION: $2,790 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $2,500 · Other+48 more: $18,073 · Other+48 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,450 · EducationSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC: $2,000 · EducationVietnam Veterans Memorial Fund Inc: $1,500 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $1,395 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art: $900 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $360 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $150 · Arts & CultureBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,150 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $500 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $100 · Health+1 more: $32 · HealthSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $750 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $300 · InternationalAARP FOUNDATION: $750 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $250 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 · Human ServicesNORTHWELL HEALTH INC: $750 · Community Improvement
Other$59,083Education$4,450Arts & Culture$4,305Health$2,382International$1,550Human Services$1,250Community Improvement$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION: $2,790 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVietnam Veterans Memorial Fund Inc: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $1,395 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $160 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $32 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STUDENT ADVOCACY INC ↗
  • Who funds Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA12.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weinberg Family Foundation (Formerly Michael F & Edith H Weinberg Char Fdtn) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weinberg Family Foundation (Formerly Michael F & Edith H Weinberg Char Fdtn). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Center for Family Services: 73% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Weinberg Family Foundation (Formerly Michael F & Edith H Weinberg Char Fdtn)?

Find your warmest path to Weinberg Family Foundation (Formerly Michael F & Edith H Weinberg Char Fdtn) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Weinberg Family Foundation (Formerly Michael F & Edith H Weinberg Char Fdtn)’s filings →

More from the funding graph